DEVARAJ vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/200444/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita(bns), 2023 Section 137(2),64(2),(m). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC030036692026
Filing Number
CRL.P/200461/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Registration No
CRL.P/200444/2026
Registration Date
24-03-2026
Judge
G BASAVARAJA
Coram
G BASAVARAJA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.P ( 112 )
Sub-Category
439(Cr.PC)/483(BNSS)-U/S 439/-U/S 483 ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEVARAJ
Adv. SHARANABASAPPA M PATIL
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
SMT LAXMI
Hearing History
Judge: G BASAVARAJA
ORDERS -1ST TIME MATTERS
ORDERS
ORDERS -1ST TIME MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | ORDERS -1ST TIME MATTERS |
| 09-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 07-04-2026 | ORDERS -1ST TIME MATTERS |
Orders
The Karnataka High Court granted bail to 23-year-old Devaraj in a case involving alleged offences under BNS sections 137(2) and 64(2)(m) and POCSO Act sections 4-6. The court considered factors including the 23-day delay in filing the complaint, the victim's age (over 17 years), the victim's statement that both parties were in a consensual relationship, and that the accused was not required for further investigation. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 bond with surety, regular court appearance, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Karnataka High Court granted bail to 23-year-old Devaraj in a case involving alleged offences under BNS sections 137(2) and 64(2)(m) and POCSO Act sections 4-6. The court considered factors including the 23-day delay in filing the complaint, the victim's age (over 17 years), the victim's statement that both parties were in a consensual relationship, and that the accused was not required for further investigation. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 bond with surety, regular court appearance, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts