PARVATHI vs VIJAY — MFA/201012/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: KAHC030030422026

Filing Number

MFA/201003/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

MFA/201012/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

K V Aravind

Coram

K V Aravind

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

CA-Claimants Appeal ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARVATHI

    Adv. VEERANAGOUDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY

  2. 2.THE MANAGER/ LEGAL OFFICER SHRIRAM GENERAL INS CO LTD

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    K V AravindView PDF

    Case Summary: MFA 201012/2026 In this motor vehicle appeal before the Karnataka High Court at Kalaburagi, the court allowed the interlocutory application (I.A. No.1/2026) seeking condonation of 275 days' delay in filing the appeal, accepting the cause shown by appellant Parvathi. Notice to respondent No.1 (Vijay) was dispensed with at the appellants' request, while respondent No.2 (Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.) accepted notice. The matter was subsequently referred to Lok Adalath for mediation/settlement proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    Additional Registrar Judicial

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/201012/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MFA 201012/2026 In this motor vehicle appeal before the Karnataka High Court at Kalaburagi, the court allowed the interlocutory application (I.A. No.1/2026) seeking condonation of 275 days' delay in filing the appeal, accepting the cause shown by appellant Parvathi. Notice to respondent No.1 (Vijay) was dispensed with at the appellants' request, while respondent No.2 (Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.) accepted notice. The matter was subsequently referred to Lok Adalath for mediation/settlement proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case