SRI MAHESH vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/200395/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita(bns), 2023 Section 189(2),191(2),191(3),115(2),118(1),352,133,74,190. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC030030392026
Filing Number
CRL.P/200400/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
CRL.P/200395/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Judge
G BASAVARAJA
Coram
G BASAVARAJA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.P ( 112 )
Sub-Category
439(Cr.PC)/483(BNSS)-U/S 439/-U/S 483 ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI MAHESH
Adv. SHARANABASAVESHWAR MAMADAPUR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Hearing History
Judge: G BASAVARAJA
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 09-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 06-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 24-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDERS |
Orders
Summary: The Karnataka High Court allowed Mahesh's bail petition in a case involving multiple charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including sections related to wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and criminal force. The court granted bail considering that the investigation was completed and charge-sheet filed, the delay in rape allegations, and the nature of offences, imposing conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 personal bond with surety, non-interference with witnesses, regular court appearance, and no involvement in similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Karnataka High Court allowed Mahesh's bail petition in a case involving multiple charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including sections related to wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and criminal force. The court granted bail considering that the investigation was completed and charge-sheet filed, the delay in rape allegations, and the nature of offences, imposing conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 personal bond with surety, non-interference with witnesses, regular court appearance, and no involvement in similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts