MAREVVA vs RAMAZANSA — MFA/201007/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: KAHC030030302026

Filing Number

MFA/200999/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

MFA/201007/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

K V Aravind

Coram

K V Aravind

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

CA-Claimants Appeal ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAREVVA

    Adv. GOPALKRISHNA B YADAV

  2. 2.YAMANAPPA

  3. 3.ANNAPURNA

  4. 4.SHANKRAMMA

  5. 5.SHARANAPPA

  6. 6.PARVATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMAZANSA

  2. 2.THE BRANCH MANAGER

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    K V AravindView PDF

    Case Summary: MFA 201007/2026 The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi allowed the petitioners' application for condonation of a 745-day delay in filing the appeal. The court accepted the cause shown and condoned the delay on the condition that if the appellants succeed, they shall not be entitled to interest for the delayed period on any enhanced compensation. The matter was subsequently referred to Lok Aadalath for settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 3Rd Time

    Additional Registrar Judicial

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 2Nd Time

    Additional Registrar Judicial

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    Additional Registrar Judicial

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/201007/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MFA 201007/2026 The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi allowed the petitioners' application for condonation of a 745-day delay in filing the appeal. The court accepted the cause shown and condoned the delay on the condition that if the appellants succeed, they shall not be entitled to interest for the delayed period on any enhanced compensation. The matter was subsequently referred to Lok Aadalath for settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case