AKBAR HUSEN vs MOHAMMED IQBAL KHAN — MFA/200952/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: KAHC030028462026

Filing Number

MFA/200948/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

MFA/200952/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Judge

K V Aravind

Coram

K V Aravind

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

CA-Claimants Appeal ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKBAR HUSEN

    Adv. KOUJALAGI CHANDRAKANTH LAXMAN

  2. 2.AMEENA BEGUM W/O AKBAR HUSEN PADEKNUR

  3. 3.SUMAIYA D/O AKBAR HUSEN PADEKNUR

  4. 4.SANA KOUSAR D/O AKBAR HUSEN PADEKNUR

  5. 5.SHABAN D/O AKBAR HUSEN PADEKNUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED IQBAL KHAN

  2. 2.THE MANAGER LEGAL /CLAIM

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    K V AravindView PDF

    Case Summary: MFA NO. 200952/2026 The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi, on 12.06.2026, allowed Interim Application No.1/2026 filed by appellants Akbar Husen and others against Mohammed Iqbal Khan and another. The court condoned the 213-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the cause shown by the appellants. The matter was subsequently referred to Lok Adalath for alternative dispute resolution at the request of the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 2Nd Time

    Additional Registrar Judicial

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    Additional Registrar Judicial

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/200952/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MFA NO. 200952/2026 The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi, on 12.06.2026, allowed Interim Application No.1/2026 filed by appellants Akbar Husen and others against Mohammed Iqbal Khan and another. The court condoned the 213-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the cause shown by the appellants. The matter was subsequently referred to Lok Adalath for alternative dispute resolution at the request of the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case