MALLIKARJUN vs ISHWARAPPA — MFA/200651/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: KAHC030021142026

Filing Number

MFA/200793/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

MFA/200651/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Judge

K V Aravind

Coram

K V Aravind

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

CA-Claimants Appeal ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MALLIKARJUN

    Adv. YASHAS S. DIKSHIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ISHWARAPPA

  2. 2.THE MANAGER LEGAL/CLAIMS

    Adv. PREETI PATIL MELKUNDI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    K V AravindView PDF

    Case Summary - MFA /200651/2026 In this Motor Vehicles Appeal before the High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi, Justice K V Aravind heard the matter between Mallikarjun (petitioner) and Ishwarappa and another (respondents) on 12.06.2026. At the request of the parties, the Court referred the matter to Lok Adalath for settlement/mediation rather than proceeding with adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Admission

    Tyagaraja N. Inavally

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Tyagaraja N. Inavally

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing - Interlocutory Appln

    Tyagaraja N. Inavally

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    Additional Registrar Judicial

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/200651/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - MFA /200651/2026 In this Motor Vehicles Appeal before the High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi, Justice K V Aravind heard the matter between Mallikarjun (petitioner) and Ishwarappa and another (respondents) on 12.06.2026. At the request of the parties, the Court referred the matter to Lok Adalath for settlement/mediation rather than proceeding with adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case