THE STATE OF KARNATAKA GOVT. ADV. vs SRI YEKANAGOUDA BASALINGAPPAGOUDA — WA/100770/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
CNR: KAHC020250822025
e-Filing Number
29-11-2025
Filing Number
WA/100714/2025
Filing Date
01-Dec-2025
Registration No
WA/100770/2025
Registration Date
15-Dec-2025
Judge
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
Coram
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WA ( 145 )
Sub-Category
R-Retirement/Retirement Benefits/Pension ( 209 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA GOVT. ADV.
-
2.THE OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
Adv. Advocate General Office
-
3.THE DIRECTOR OF PRE UNIVERSITY BOARD
Adv. Advocate General Office
-
4.THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS BELGAUM
Adv. Advocate General Office
-
5.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPT OF PRE UNIVERSITY
Adv. Advocate General Office
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI YEKANAGOUDA BASALINGAPPAGOUDA
-
2.THE B T PATIL COMPOSITE JUNIOR COLLEGE
Case History
-
26-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-Mar-2026
B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad adjourned the case (WA NO. 100802/2025 and connected matters) involving The State of Karnataka vs. Rudragouda Malleshappa Dammalli and another. The court directed the office to re-list the proceedings on 17.06.2026, noting that similar matters pending with the Principal Bench are reserved for judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Preliminary Hearing
M.i.arun , B. Muralidhara Pai
-
18-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WA/100770/2025
Summary: The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad adjourned the case (WA NO. 100802/2025 and connected matters) involving The State of Karnataka vs. Rudragouda Malleshappa Dammalli and another. The court directed the office to re-list the proceedings on 17.06.2026, noting that similar matters pending with the Principal Bench are reserved for judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts