MAHADEV LAXMAN SINGE ALIAS SINGES S/O LAXMAN SINGE ALIAS SINGES vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/105277/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),351(2),352,R/W3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC020250672025
Filing Number
CRL.P/105105/2025
Filing Date
01-Dec-2025
Registration No
CRL.P/105277/2025
Registration Date
18-Dec-2025
Judge
Anant Ramanath Hegde
Coram
Anant Ramanath Hegde
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.P ( 112 )
Sub-Category
482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)-U/S 482/-U/S 528 ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHADEV LAXMAN SINGE ALIAS SINGES S/O LAXMAN SINGE ALIAS SINGES
Adv. AVINASH M ANGADI
-
2.LAKSHMAVVA ALIAS LAXMIBAI LAXMAN SINGE ALIAS SINGES W/O LAXMAN SINGE ALIAS SINGES
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
2.SMT SAVITA MAHADEVA BADODE W/O MAHADEVA BADODE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Aug-2026
Orders
Addl. Registrar Judicial
-
09-Jun-2026
Anant Ramanath HegdeView PDF
Case Summary: CRL.P 105277/2025 The petitioners sought quashing of FIR Crime No. 67/2025 registered by Belagavi City Women Police Station for alleged offences under BNS sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), and 352. However, the court dismissed the petition as not pressed after the petitioners' counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed. The court reserved liberty for the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet through appropriate legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Feb-2026
Admission
V.srishananda
-
20-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRL.P/105277/2025
Case Summary: CRL.P 105277/2025 The petitioners sought quashing of FIR Crime No. 67/2025 registered by Belagavi City Women Police Station for alleged offences under BNS sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), and 352. However, the court dismissed the petition as not pressed after the petitioners' counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed. The court reserved liberty for the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet through appropriate legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts