NAGARAJ S/O LATE BHIMMANNA JAWALI ALIAS BIDARSHETTY vs D THIMMAPPA S/O D THIMMANNA — WA/100740/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC020237772025
Filing Number
WA/100688/2025
Filing Date
13-Nov-2025
Registration No
WA/100740/2025
Registration Date
25-Nov-2025
Judge
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
Coram
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WA ( 145 )
Sub-Category
RES-Residuary ( 197 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAGARAJ S/O LATE BHIMMANNA JAWALI ALIAS BIDARSHETTY
Adv. MALLIKARJUNASWAMY BASAYYA HIREMATH
-
2.BASAVARAJ S/O LATE NINGAPPA UPPAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.D THIMMAPPA S/O D THIMMANNA
-
2.GANESH S/O D THIMMANNA
-
3.MALLIKARJUN S/O D THIMMANNA
-
4.D JAGADISH S/O D THIMMANNA
-
5.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
6.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
-
7.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOPPAL
-
8.THE TAHASILDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF
The Karnataka High Court at Dharwad rejected a writ appeal challenging a lower court's decision that protected private respondents' rights to 2 acres of land in Gangavathi Taluk. The court upheld the single judge's finding that the respondents' unauthorized occupation was regularized in 1993 with valid mutation entries, making the Deputy Commissioner's order to reserve the land as a burial ground without jurisdiction. The appeal was rejected as there was no factual error in the lower court's judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time
Addl. Registrar Judicial
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WA/100740/2025
The Karnataka High Court at Dharwad rejected a writ appeal challenging a lower court's decision that protected private respondents' rights to 2 acres of land in Gangavathi Taluk. The court upheld the single judge's finding that the respondents' unauthorized occupation was regularized in 1993 with valid mutation entries, making the Deputy Commissioner's order to reserve the land as a burial ground without jurisdiction. The appeal was rejected as there was no factual error in the lower court's judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts