SRI MANJUNATH D A vs THE VICE CHANCELLOR — WP/107918/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC020222602025
Filing Number
WP/108262/2025
Filing Date
27-Oct-2025
Registration No
WP/107918/2025
Registration Date
27-Oct-2025
Judge
Jyoti M
Coram
Jyoti M
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
TR-Transfers ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI MANJUNATH D A
Adv. RAKESH M BILKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE VICE CHANCELLOR
-
2.THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER,
-
3.THE REGISTRAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Jyoti MView PDF
The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dismissed Writ Petition No. 107918 of 2025 filed by Sri Manjunath D. A, an Assistant Cook and Care Taker, against the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel submitted a memo requesting dismissal, and after confirming it was a conscious decision, the court granted the dismissal and discharged all interim orders and pending interlocutory applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Preliminary Hearing
K.s.hemalekha
-
17-Feb-2026
Preliminary Hearing
K.s.hemalekha
-
16-Feb-2026
Preliminary Hearing
K.s.hemalekha
-
12-Feb-2026
Preliminary Hearing
K.s.hemalekha
-
10-Dec-2025
Preliminary Hearing
M.nagaprasanna
-
17-Nov-2025
Fresh Matter/S
M.nagaprasanna
-
27-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/107918/2025
The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dismissed Writ Petition No. 107918 of 2025 filed by Sri Manjunath D. A, an Assistant Cook and Care Taker, against the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel submitted a memo requesting dismissal, and after confirming it was a conscious decision, the court granted the dismissal and discharged all interim orders and pending interlocutory applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts