THE PRESIDENT vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WP/103102/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC020208492021

Filing Number

WP/103268/2021

Filing Date

26-Aug-2021

Registration No

WP/103102/2021

Registration Date

27-Aug-2021

Judge

Jyoti M

Coram

Jyoti M

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

RES-Residuary ( 91 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE PRESIDENT

    Adv. S B HEBBALLI

  2. 2.THE PRESIDENT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

  2. 2.THE BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

  3. 3.THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

  4. 4.THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Jyoti MView PDF

    The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Writ Petition No. 103102 of 2021 filed by Masjid-e-Ammar and Bagalkot Nagar Bagawan Jamat against the State of Karnataka and the Bagalkot Town Development Authority, after the petitioners' counsel requested dismissal on the ground that the petition had become infructuous. All interim orders and pending interlocutory applications were consequently discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Sep-2021

    Orders

    S.R. Krishna Kumar

  4. 27-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/103102/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Writ Petition No. 103102 of 2021 filed by Masjid-e-Ammar and Bagalkot Nagar Bagawan Jamat against the State of Karnataka and the Bagalkot Town Development Authority, after the petitioners' counsel requested dismissal on the ground that the petition had become infructuous. All interim orders and pending interlocutory applications were consequently discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case