SHRI S RAJKUMAR S/O SRIRAMAIAH M C vs THE DIVISIONAL SECTION COMMISSIONER/RPF — WA/100589/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: KAHC020192772024

Filing Number

WA/100575/2024

Filing Date

29-Oct-2024

Registration No

WA/100589/2024

Registration Date

30-Nov-2024

Judge

B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

Coram

B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 145 )

Sub-Category

DIS-Dismissal/Discharge/Termination ( 211 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI S RAJKUMAR S/O SRIRAMAIAH M C

    Adv. VIJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DIVISIONAL SECTION COMMISSIONER/RPF

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY CHIEF SECURITY COMMISSIONER, RPF

  3. 3.THE IG CUM PRINCIPAL CHIEF SECURITY COMMISSIONER

  4. 4.THE UNION OF INDIA

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF

    The case (WA NO. 100589/2024) has been adjourned and re-listed for hearing on 22.04.2026. The court directed the petitioner's counsel to serve copies of the petition on the respondent's chambers at the earliest, and notice was called upon the respondent's Senior Standing Counsel to accept service. No substantive order on merits has been passed yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/100589/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The case (WA NO. 100589/2024) has been adjourned and re-listed for hearing on 22.04.2026. The court directed the petitioner's counsel to serve copies of the petition on the respondent's chambers at the earliest, and notice was called upon the respondent's Senior Standing Counsel to accept service. No substantive order on merits has been passed yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case