S KATTEBASAPPA ALIAS GUDDADA BASAPPA S/O LATE S SHARANAPPA vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER — WP/103958/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC020133912022
Filing Number
WP/104437/2022
Filing Date
14-Sep-2022
Registration No
WP/103958/2022
Registration Date
28-Sep-2022
Judge
Jyoti M
Coram
Jyoti M
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
RR/SUR-Record of rights,Survey & Boundary disp. ( 96 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S KATTEBASAPPA ALIAS GUDDADA BASAPPA S/O LATE S SHARANAPPA
Adv. CHIDANANDA B
-
2.G.B NAGARAJ S/O S KATTEBASAPPA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
-
2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
-
3.THE TAHSILDAR BALLARI TALUK
-
4.THE REVENUE INSPECTOR BALLARI HOBLI
-
5.THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT
-
6.SMT BUGGESHWARI W/O LATE KATTEBASAPPA
-
7.S NAGARAJ S/O LATE S SHEKARAPPA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Jyoti MView PDF
Summary The Karnataka High Court allowed the writ petition and remanded the case to the Assistant Commissioner, finding procedural lapses in handling a land revenue dispute. The court quashed orders from 2016, 2021, and 2022 because the Assistant Commissioner failed to pass a separate order on the condonation of delay application before dismissing the appeal, and the Tahsildar improperly altered mutation entries while the appeal was pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
Jyoti M
-
03-Dec-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
Anant Ramanath Hegde
-
18-Nov-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
Anant Ramanath Hegde
-
28-Oct-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
Anant Ramanath Hegde
-
11-Sep-2025
Hearing - Interlocutory Appln
Suraj Govindaraj
-
29-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WP/103958/2022
Summary The Karnataka High Court allowed the writ petition and remanded the case to the Assistant Commissioner, finding procedural lapses in handling a land revenue dispute. The court quashed orders from 2016, 2021, and 2022 because the Assistant Commissioner failed to pass a separate order on the condonation of delay application before dismissing the appeal, and the Tahsildar improperly altered mutation entries while the appeal was pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts