THE STATE OF KARNATAKA GOVT. ADV. vs VALLURI SATYANARAYANA SO SURYARAO — WA/100376/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Disposed: --REJECTED on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC020126692025

e-Filing Number

20-06-2025

Filing Number

WA/100336/2025

Filing Date

20-Jun-2025

Registration No

WA/100376/2025

Registration Date

05-Jul-2025

Judge

B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

Coram

B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 145 )

Sub-Category

RES-Residuary ( 197 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--REJECTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA GOVT. ADV.

  2. 2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

    Adv. AGO

  3. 3.THE TAHASILDAR

    Adv. AGO

  4. 4.THE TAHASILDAR

    Adv. AGO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VALLURI SATYANARAYANA SO SURYARAO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF

    The High Court of Karnataka rejected the State's writ appeal challenging an earlier order directing restoration of land revenue entries in favor of Valluri Satyanarayana. The court held that the complainant was entitled to benefit from the omission of Sections 79A-79C of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, as the statutory appeal remedy remained available within the prescribed timeframe. The court directed revenue authorities to restore entries for eight surveyed properties within three months, with liberty for fresh complaint if authorities fail to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

  5. 23-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/100376/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka rejected the State's writ appeal challenging an earlier order directing restoration of land revenue entries in favor of Valluri Satyanarayana. The court held that the complainant was entitled to benefit from the omission of Sections 79A-79C of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, as the statutory appeal remedy remained available within the prescribed timeframe. The court directed revenue authorities to restore entries for eight surveyed properties within three months, with liberty for fresh complaint if authorities fail to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case