KARNATAKA UPA-LOKAYUKTA-1 vs SRI DAMODHAR RAMA — WP/105059/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: KAHC020125842024
Filing Number
WP/104246/2024
Filing Date
22-Jul-2024
Registration No
WP/105059/2024
Registration Date
27-Aug-2024
Judge
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
Coram
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
KAT-Karnataka Administrative Tribunal ( 103 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KARNATAKA UPA-LOKAYUKTA-1
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI DAMODHAR RAMA
-
2.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
3.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF
Case Summary: WP/105059/2024 The High Court of Karnataka rejected the Karnataka Lokayukta's writ petition challenging the State Administrative Tribunal's order. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision quashing a penalty order (withholding four annual increments) imposed on Deputy Tahasildar Sri Damodhar Rama Bellimane, finding that the borrowing authority failed to consult the lending authority before imposing the penalty, as mandated by Rule 16(2) of the Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1957. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Preliminary Hearing
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
-
17-Apr-2026
B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Dismissal
Addl. Registrar Judicial
-
17-Mar-2026
Dismissal
Addl. Registrar Judicial
-
09-Feb-2026
Orders
Addl. Registrar Judicial
-
29-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WP/105059/2024
Case Summary: WP/105059/2024 The High Court of Karnataka rejected the Karnataka Lokayukta's writ petition challenging the State Administrative Tribunal's order. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision quashing a penalty order (withholding four annual increments) imposed on Deputy Tahasildar Sri Damodhar Rama Bellimane, finding that the borrowing authority failed to consult the lending authority before imposing the penalty, as mandated by Rule 16(2) of the Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1957. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts