SHIVANAND S.O. BASAPPA KOLIGUDDA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WA/100382/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC020122662025
Filing Number
WA/100328/2025
Filing Date
17-Jun-2025
Registration No
WA/100382/2025
Registration Date
05-Jul-2025
Judge
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
Coram
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WA ( 145 )
Sub-Category
RR/SUR-Record of rights,Survey & Boundary disp. ( 198 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVANAND S.O. BASAPPA KOLIGUDDA
Adv. YADAWAD GIRISH ARUN
-
2.SHRISHAIL S.O. BASAPPA KOLIGUDDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
2.THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
-
3.THE COMMISSIONER
-
4.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
-
5.THE CITY SURVEY OFFICER
-
6.THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
-
7.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF
The Karnataka High Court at Dharwad allowed the writ appeal and permitted the appellants to pursue their land development project afresh by filing a fresh application with the Mahalingapura CMC for necessary approvals, following the proper statutory procedure involving town planning authorities. The court directed that the appellants cannot be impeded by prior unsuccessful attempts and that authorities must act expeditiously on compliant applications under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jul-2025
Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time
Addl. Registrar Judicial
-
17-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WA/100382/2025
The Karnataka High Court at Dharwad allowed the writ appeal and permitted the appellants to pursue their land development project afresh by filing a fresh application with the Mahalingapura CMC for necessary approvals, following the proper statutory procedure involving town planning authorities. The court directed that the appellants cannot be impeded by prior unsuccessful attempts and that authorities must act expeditiously on compliant applications under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts