MUZAMMIL S/O MOHAMMEDSHARIF ATTAR vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WA/100386/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC020104772026
Filing Number
WA/100391/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
WA/100386/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
S.sunil Dutt Yadav , K.g.shanthi
Coram
S.sunil Dutt Yadav , K.g.shanthi
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WA ( 145 )
Sub-Category
POLICE-Karnataka Police Act ( 139 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUZAMMIL S/O MOHAMMEDSHARIF ATTAR
Adv. ANWARALI D NADAF
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (L AND O)
-
3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
S.sunil Dutt Yadav,k.g.shanthiView PDF
Case Summary: WA 100386/2026 - Muzammil v. State of Karnataka The High Court of Karnataka set aside a six-month externment order passed against Muzammil under Section 56 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, finding it was passed without jurisdiction. The court held that the cases cited to justify externment involved offences under the K.P. Act Section 87, IPC Section 160, BNS Section 192, and Cr.P.C Sections 107/126—none of which fall within the prescribed categories (Sections 56(a)-(h)) required for externment orders. The court ordered the appellant's immediate release, noting that while alternative statutory remedies exist, writ petitions challenging fundamental rights violations (Article 21) are maintainable even where appellate remedies are available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Fresh Matter/S
S.sunil Dutt Yadav , K.g.shanthi
-
16-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WA/100386/2026
Case Summary: WA 100386/2026 - Muzammil v. State of Karnataka The High Court of Karnataka set aside a six-month externment order passed against Muzammil under Section 56 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, finding it was passed without jurisdiction. The court held that the cases cited to justify externment involved offences under the K.P. Act Section 87, IPC Section 160, BNS Section 192, and Cr.P.C Sections 107/126—none of which fall within the prescribed categories (Sections 56(a)-(h)) required for externment orders. The court ordered the appellant's immediate release, noting that while alternative statutory remedies exist, writ petitions challenging fundamental rights violations (Article 21) are maintainable even where appellate remedies are available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts