THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, vs SMT. AKKAVVA — MFA/101947/2025

Case under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act Section 74. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED AND REMANDED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC020081012025

Filing Number

MFA/101915/2025

Filing Date

15-Apr-2025

Registration No

MFA/101947/2025

Registration Date

09-May-2025

Judge

B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

Coram

B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

LAC-RFCTLARR (Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition , rehabilitation and resettlement act) ( 77 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED AND REMANDED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act Section 74

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

    Adv. K S PATIL

  2. 2.CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. AKKAVVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF

    The High Court of Karnataka allowed the irrigation project authority's appeal, setting aside the lower authority's award of Rs. 3,80,000 per acre compensation for acquired agricultural land. The court found the authority violated natural justice principles by rejecting the claimant's request to present evidence and basing its decision solely on a prior judgment in a different case without considering the specific characteristics of the land in question. The matter was remanded for a fresh hearing where both parties would be given opportunity to present evidence before determining the fair market value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF

  4. 09-Jul-2025

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    Addl. Registrar Judicial

  5. 15-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/101947/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka allowed the irrigation project authority's appeal, setting aside the lower authority's award of Rs. 3,80,000 per acre compensation for acquired agricultural land. The court found the authority violated natural justice principles by rejecting the claimant's request to present evidence and basing its decision solely on a prior judgment in a different case without considering the specific characteristics of the land in question. The matter was remanded for a fresh hearing where both parties would be given opportunity to present evidence before determining the fair market value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case