RENUKA vs MOHAMMED SADIQ — MFA/101975/2015

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Nov-2015

CNR: KAHC020077502015

Filing Number

MFA/101975/2015

Filing Date

07-Jul-2015

Registration No

MFA/101975/2015

Registration Date

07-Jul-2015

Judge

B. Muralidhara Pai

Coram

B. Muralidhara Pai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

MV-U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act ( 60 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RENUKA

    Adv. SANJAY S KATAGERI, 2.

  2. 2.SAVITA D/O ASHOK BAJANTRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED SADIQ

  2. 2.THE MANAGER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    B. Muralidhara PaiView PDF

    The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal filed by the widow and minor daughter of Ashok Yallappa Bajantri, who sought Rs.10 lakh compensation for his death in an alleged truck accident on 09.05.2011. The court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's dismissal, finding that claimants failed to prove the truck's involvement or driver's negligence—they relied solely on a police charge sheet without examining eyewitnesses cited in the investigation, and the original complaint was filed against an unknown vehicle with no direct evidence supporting their claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Chillakur Sumalatha

  4. 27-Nov-2025

    Admission

    Chillakur Sumalatha

  5. 17-Nov-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Nov-2015

    Admission

    L.narayana Swamy

  7. 07-Jul-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/101975/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal filed by the widow and minor daughter of Ashok Yallappa Bajantri, who sought Rs.10 lakh compensation for his death in an alleged truck accident on 09.05.2011. The court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's dismissal, finding that claimants failed to prove the truck's involvement or driver's negligence—they relied solely on a police charge sheet without examining eyewitnesses cited in the investigation, and the original complaint was filed against an unknown vehicle with no direct evidence supporting their claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case