BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED vs NINGAPPA IRAPPA MYAGERI — CP/100193/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC020076892026

Filing Number

CP/100225/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CP/100193/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

B. Muralidhara Pai

Coram

B. Muralidhara Pai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CP ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. SHRIDHAR PRABHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NINGAPPA IRAPPA MYAGERI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    B. Muralidhara PaiView PDF

    Summary: CP No.100193/2026 - BDK Valves Private Limited v. Ningappa Irappa Myageri Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Decision Date: June 12, 2026 Judge: Hon'ble Justice B. Muralidhara Pai Key Facts BDK Valves Private Limited terminated 163 employees on November 27, 2024, citing grave misconduct arising from participation in an illegal strike. The workers' union subsequently filed industrial disputes before the Labour Court, Hubballi, under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Court's Decision DISMISSED - All connected petitions dismissed. Core Reasoning The petitioner sought transfer of pending labour disputes to Industrial Tribunals under the newly enacted Industrial Relations Code, 2020, arguing that: - The Code came into effect November 21, 2025 - The old Industrial Disputes Act was repealed - Labour Courts lack jurisdiction under the new procedural framework However, the court held: 1. Tribunals Not Yet Constituted: Industrial Tribunals under the Code have not been established, making transfer impossible. 2. Statutory Continuity Orders: Central Government notifications dated December 8, 2025, and February 2, 2026, clarified that existing Labour Courts and statutory authorities shall continue functioning until corresponding authorities are appointed under the new Code to ensure continuity and avoid administrative vacuum. 3. Jurisdictional Framework: Transfer is governed by statutory provisions (Section 33B of ID Act; Section 92 of Code), not general civil procedure rules. Articles 226-227 apply only to bias or natural justice violations, not jurisdiction questions. 4. Section 24 CPC Inapplicable: Courts cannot transfer proceedings from specialized tribunals using general civil procedure powers when no competent receiving forum exists. The dismissal affirms that Labour Courts retain jurisdiction pending formal tribunal establishment under the new Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Orders

    B. Muralidhara Pai

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/100193/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CP No.100193/2026 - BDK Valves Private Limited v. Ningappa Irappa Myageri Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Decision Date: June 12, 2026 Judge: Hon'ble Justice B. Muralidhara Pai Key Facts BDK Valves Private Limited terminated 163 employees on November 27, 2024, citing grave misconduct arising from participation in an illegal strike. The workers' union subsequently filed industrial disputes before the Labour Court, Hubballi, under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Court's Decision DISMISSED - All connected petitions dismissed. Core Reasoning The petitioner sought transfer of pending labour disputes to Industrial Tribunals under the newly enacted Industrial Relations Code, 2020, arguing that: - The Code came into effect November 21, 2025 - The old Industrial Disputes Act was repealed - Labour Courts lack jurisdiction under the new procedural framework However, the court held: 1. Tribunals Not Yet Constituted: Industrial Tribunals under the Code have not been established, making transfer impossible. 2. Statutory Continuity Orders: Central Government notifications dated December 8, 2025, and February 2, 2026, clarified that existing Labour Courts and statutory authorities shall continue functioning until corresponding authorities are appointed under the new Code to ensure continuity and avoid administrative vacuum. 3. Jurisdictional Framework: Transfer is governed by statutory provisions (Section 33B of ID Act; Section 92 of Code), not general civil procedure rules. Articles 226-227 apply only to bias or natural justice violations, not jurisdiction questions. 4. Section 24 CPC Inapplicable: Courts cannot transfer proceedings from specialized tribunals using general civil procedure powers when no competent receiving forum exists. The dismissal affirms that Labour Courts retain jurisdiction pending formal tribunal establishment under the new Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case