BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED vs KAREPPA MAREPPA WALIKAR — CP/100213/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC020076712026

Filing Number

CP/100217/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CP/100213/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

B. Muralidhara Pai

Coram

B. Muralidhara Pai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. SHRIDHAR PRABHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAREPPA MAREPPA WALIKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    B. Muralidhara PaiView PDF

    Case Summary: CP/100213/2026 - BDK Valves Private Limited v. Kareppa Mareppa Walikar Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 12 June 2026 Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Muralidhara Pai Case Overview BDK Valves Private Limited sought to transfer industrial disputes pending before the Labour Court, Hubballi to Industrial Tribunals under the newly enacted Industrial Relations Code, 2020. The company terminated 140+ workers on 27 November 2024 for alleged grave misconduct related to illegal strike participation. A trade union subsequently filed industrial disputes before the Labour Court. Key Issues 1. Whether pending Labour Court cases should be transferred to Industrial Tribunals under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 2. Whether the Labour Court retains jurisdiction after the Code's commencement on 21 November 2025 3. Applicability of Section 24 CPC and Articles 226-227 of the Constitution for such transfer Court's Decision The petitions were dismissed. Reasoning The court held that: 1. Statutory authorities continue functioning: Government notifications dated 8 December 2025 and 2 February 2026 clarified that existing Labour Courts shall continue functioning until corresponding authorities are appointed under the Code, ensuring continuity and avoiding administrative vacuum. 2. Section 24 CPC inapplicable: Special tribunal cases cannot be transferred under general CPC provisions. Transfer under the Industrial Relations Code is governed by statutory provisions (Section 92 of the Code). 3. No grounds for writ jurisdiction: Constitutional remedies (Articles 226-227) apply only for bias, natural justice violations, or special circumstances—not for jurisdictional disagreements. 4. Tribunals not yet constituted: The Industrial Tribunals under the Code have not been established, making transfer impossible. The court rejected the petitioner's contention that Labour Courts lack jurisdiction and emphasized that continuity of adjudication must be maintained during the transition period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Orders

    B. Muralidhara Pai

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/100213/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CP/100213/2026 - BDK Valves Private Limited v. Kareppa Mareppa Walikar Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 12 June 2026 Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Muralidhara Pai Case Overview BDK Valves Private Limited sought to transfer industrial disputes pending before the Labour Court, Hubballi to Industrial Tribunals under the newly enacted Industrial Relations Code, 2020. The company terminated 140+ workers on 27 November 2024 for alleged grave misconduct related to illegal strike participation. A trade union subsequently filed industrial disputes before the Labour Court. Key Issues 1. Whether pending Labour Court cases should be transferred to Industrial Tribunals under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 2. Whether the Labour Court retains jurisdiction after the Code's commencement on 21 November 2025 3. Applicability of Section 24 CPC and Articles 226-227 of the Constitution for such transfer Court's Decision The petitions were dismissed. Reasoning The court held that: 1. Statutory authorities continue functioning: Government notifications dated 8 December 2025 and 2 February 2026 clarified that existing Labour Courts shall continue functioning until corresponding authorities are appointed under the Code, ensuring continuity and avoiding administrative vacuum. 2. Section 24 CPC inapplicable: Special tribunal cases cannot be transferred under general CPC provisions. Transfer under the Industrial Relations Code is governed by statutory provisions (Section 92 of the Code). 3. No grounds for writ jurisdiction: Constitutional remedies (Articles 226-227) apply only for bias, natural justice violations, or special circumstances—not for jurisdictional disagreements. 4. Tribunals not yet constituted: The Industrial Tribunals under the Code have not been established, making transfer impossible. The court rejected the petitioner's contention that Labour Courts lack jurisdiction and emphasized that continuity of adjudication must be maintained during the transition period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case