BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED vs ABBASALI ABDULREHAMAN KHARADI — CP/100179/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC020076282026
Filing Number
CP/100195/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
CP/100179/2026
Registration Date
22-Apr-2026
Judge
B. Muralidhara Pai
Coram
B. Muralidhara Pai
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CP ( 106 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. SHRIDHAR PRABHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.ABBASALI ABDULREHAMAN KHARADI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
B. Muralidhara PaiView PDF
Summary of CP/100179/2026 Case: BDK Valves Private Limited v. Abbasali Abdulrehaman Kharadi (and connected petitions) Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Decision Date: 12 June 2026 Outcome: Petitions dismissed --- Key Facts BDK Valves Private Limited (petitioner) terminated the services of 163 workers, including respondent Abbasali Abdulrehaman Kharadi, on 27 November 2024 for alleged grave misconduct related to participation in an illegal strike. The Trade Union raised industrial disputes before the Labour Court, Hubballi under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Legal Issue The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 came into force on 21 November 2025, repealing the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner sought to transfer pending industrial disputes from the Labour Court to Industrial Tribunals under the new Code, arguing that the Labour Court lacks jurisdiction under the repealed statutory framework. Court's Decision The court dismissed the petitions, holding that: 1. Tribunal Constitution: Industrial Tribunals under the Code have not yet been constituted, making transfer impossible under Section 24 CPC. 2. Government Clarification: Central Government orders dated 8 December 2025 and 2 February 2026 clarified that existing Labour Courts and statutory authorities continue functioning until corresponding authorities are appointed under the Code. 3. Jurisdictional Authority: Labour Courts retain jurisdiction despite repeal, ensuring continuity and preventing legal/administrative vacuum. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that proceeding before labour Courts are no longer valid under repealed statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Orders
B. Muralidhara Pai
-
23-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CP/100179/2026
Summary of CP/100179/2026 Case: BDK Valves Private Limited v. Abbasali Abdulrehaman Kharadi (and connected petitions) Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Decision Date: 12 June 2026 Outcome: Petitions dismissed --- Key Facts BDK Valves Private Limited (petitioner) terminated the services of 163 workers, including respondent Abbasali Abdulrehaman Kharadi, on 27 November 2024 for alleged grave misconduct related to participation in an illegal strike. The Trade Union raised industrial disputes before the Labour Court, Hubballi under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Legal Issue The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 came into force on 21 November 2025, repealing the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner sought to transfer pending industrial disputes from the Labour Court to Industrial Tribunals under the new Code, arguing that the Labour Court lacks jurisdiction under the repealed statutory framework. Court's Decision The court dismissed the petitions, holding that: 1. Tribunal Constitution: Industrial Tribunals under the Code have not yet been constituted, making transfer impossible under Section 24 CPC. 2. Government Clarification: Central Government orders dated 8 December 2025 and 2 February 2026 clarified that existing Labour Courts and statutory authorities continue functioning until corresponding authorities are appointed under the Code. 3. Jurisdictional Authority: Labour Courts retain jurisdiction despite repeal, ensuring continuity and preventing legal/administrative vacuum. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that proceeding before labour Courts are no longer valid under repealed statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts