BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED vs PRAKASH RAMANNA MALALI — CP/100236/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC020075912026

Filing Number

CP/100174/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CP/100236/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

B. Muralidhara Pai

Coram

B. Muralidhara Pai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CP ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. SHRIDHAR PRABHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH RAMANNA MALALI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    B. Muralidhara PaiView PDF

    Summary: CP/100236/2026 - BDK Valves Private Limited v. Prakash Ramanna Malali Case Type: Civil Petition under Section 24 CPC and Articles 226-227 of the Constitution Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: June 12, 2026 Parties: - Petitioner: BDK Valves Private Limited - Respondent: Prakash Ramanna Malali (and 139 others in connected petitions) Decision: Petitions DISMISSED Key Facts: - Company terminated respondents' services on November 27, 2024, citing grave misconduct from participation in illegal strike - Trade Union raised industrial disputes before Deputy Commissioner; Government referred to Labour Court on November 15, 2024 - Industrial Relations Code 2020 was notified November 21, 2025, replacing the 1947 Industrial Disputes Act Main Issue: Whether pending industrial disputes should be transferred from Labour Courts to Industrial Tribunals under the new Code, given that Tribunals haven't been constituted yet. Court's Reasoning: 1. Industrial Tribunals under the Code are not yet constituted; Section 24 CPC cannot transfer cases to non-existent forums 2. Government's "Removal of Difficulties" Orders (Dec 8, 2025 and Feb 2, 2026) clarify that existing Labour Courts continue functioning until corresponding Code-based authorities are appointed 3. Labour Courts remain competent to adjudicate pending cases despite procedural framework changes 4. Transfer powers under ID Act/Code rest with appropriate government, not courts; Articles 226-227 powers apply only for bias/natural justice violations, not jurisdiction disputes Outcome: Labour Court proceedings continue under existing framework until Industrial Tribunals are formally constituted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Orders

    B. Muralidhara Pai

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/100236/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CP/100236/2026 - BDK Valves Private Limited v. Prakash Ramanna Malali Case Type: Civil Petition under Section 24 CPC and Articles 226-227 of the Constitution Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: June 12, 2026 Parties: - Petitioner: BDK Valves Private Limited - Respondent: Prakash Ramanna Malali (and 139 others in connected petitions) Decision: Petitions DISMISSED Key Facts: - Company terminated respondents' services on November 27, 2024, citing grave misconduct from participation in illegal strike - Trade Union raised industrial disputes before Deputy Commissioner; Government referred to Labour Court on November 15, 2024 - Industrial Relations Code 2020 was notified November 21, 2025, replacing the 1947 Industrial Disputes Act Main Issue: Whether pending industrial disputes should be transferred from Labour Courts to Industrial Tribunals under the new Code, given that Tribunals haven't been constituted yet. Court's Reasoning: 1. Industrial Tribunals under the Code are not yet constituted; Section 24 CPC cannot transfer cases to non-existent forums 2. Government's "Removal of Difficulties" Orders (Dec 8, 2025 and Feb 2, 2026) clarify that existing Labour Courts continue functioning until corresponding Code-based authorities are appointed 3. Labour Courts remain competent to adjudicate pending cases despite procedural framework changes 4. Transfer powers under ID Act/Code rest with appropriate government, not courts; Articles 226-227 powers apply only for bias/natural justice violations, not jurisdiction disputes Outcome: Labour Court proceedings continue under existing framework until Industrial Tribunals are formally constituted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case