RAVI S/O. KANAKAPPA PATROT vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.A/100233/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code1 Section 302. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC020073872025
Filing Number
CRL.A/100246/2025
Filing Date
01-04-2025
Registration No
CRL.A/100233/2025
Registration Date
15-04-2025
Judge
H.P.SANDESH , B. MURALIDHARA PAI
Coram
H.P.SANDESH , B. MURALIDHARA PAI
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRL.A ( 110 )
Sub-Category
C-Convicted ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVI S/O. KANAKAPPA PATROT
Adv. KANDAGAL SHEKHARAPPA PUNDALEEKAPPA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Hearing History
Judge: H.P.SANDESH , B. MURALIDHARA PAI
HEARING - INTERLOCUTORY APPLN
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2025 | HEARING - INTERLOCUTORY APPLN |
| 15-12-2025 | FINAL HEARING |
| 11-11-2025 | FINAL HEARING |
| 28-10-2025 | FINAL HEARING |
| 17-09-2025 | FINAL HEARING |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal challenging his life sentence conviction for murder under IPC Section 302. The court upheld the trial judge's reliance on circumstantial evidence including: credible "last seen" witness testimony placing the accused with the deceased on the night of the crime, blood-stained clothing of the accused matching the victim's blood group AB, and the accused's failure to provide explanations for incriminating circumstances. The court found the chain of circumstantial evidence complete and sufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal challenging his life sentence conviction for murder under IPC Section 302. The court upheld the trial judge's reliance on circumstantial evidence including: credible "last seen" witness testimony placing the accused with the deceased on the night of the crime, blood-stained clothing of the accused matching the victim's blood group AB, and the accused's failure to provide explanations for incriminating circumstances. The court found the chain of circumstantial evidence complete and sufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts