BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED vs PARASHURAM CHANDRAKANT SHIMPI — CP/100126/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC020073492026

Filing Number

CP/100109/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

CP/100126/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

B. Muralidhara Pai

Coram

B. Muralidhara Pai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CP ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. SHRIDHAR PRABHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARASHURAM CHANDRAKANT SHIMPI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    B. Muralidhara PaiView PDF

    Summary of CP/100126/2026 Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Petitioner: BDK Valves Private Limited Respondent: Parashuram Chandrakant Shimpi (and 142 others in connected petitions) Case Overview BDK Valves sought to transfer industrial disputes pending before the Labour Court, Hubballi to Industrial Tribunals under the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. The company had terminated its employees on 27.11.2024 for alleged misconduct related to illegal strike participation, leading the workers' union to file disputes before the Labour Court under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Key Issue Whether pending cases at the Labour Court should be transferred to newly-constituted Tribunals under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (which came into force on 21.11.2025), given that the procedural framework under the repealed acts no longer applies. Court's Decision The petitions were dismissed. The court held that: 1. Tribunals not yet constituted: Industrial Tribunals under the Code have not been established, making transfer impossible. 2. Government clarifications valid: Central Government notifications (08.12.2025 and 02.02.2026) clarified that existing Labour Courts shall continue functioning until corresponding authorities are appointed under the Code—to ensure continuity and avoid administrative vacuum. 3. Jurisdiction persists: Despite statutory repeal, Labour Courts retain jurisdiction to adjudicate pending cases to maintain procedural continuity. 4. Proper transfer mechanism: Transfer of proceedings is governed by statutory provisions (Section 33B of ID Act; Section 92 of the Code), not general civil procedure rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Orders

    B. Muralidhara Pai

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/100126/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CP/100126/2026 Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Petitioner: BDK Valves Private Limited Respondent: Parashuram Chandrakant Shimpi (and 142 others in connected petitions) Case Overview BDK Valves sought to transfer industrial disputes pending before the Labour Court, Hubballi to Industrial Tribunals under the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. The company had terminated its employees on 27.11.2024 for alleged misconduct related to illegal strike participation, leading the workers' union to file disputes before the Labour Court under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Key Issue Whether pending cases at the Labour Court should be transferred to newly-constituted Tribunals under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (which came into force on 21.11.2025), given that the procedural framework under the repealed acts no longer applies. Court's Decision The petitions were dismissed. The court held that: 1. Tribunals not yet constituted: Industrial Tribunals under the Code have not been established, making transfer impossible. 2. Government clarifications valid: Central Government notifications (08.12.2025 and 02.02.2026) clarified that existing Labour Courts shall continue functioning until corresponding authorities are appointed under the Code—to ensure continuity and avoid administrative vacuum. 3. Jurisdiction persists: Despite statutory repeal, Labour Courts retain jurisdiction to adjudicate pending cases to maintain procedural continuity. 4. Proper transfer mechanism: Transfer of proceedings is governed by statutory provisions (Section 33B of ID Act; Section 92 of the Code), not general civil procedure rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case