BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED vs MALLAPPA GURUSIDDAPPA CHADICHAL — CP/100237/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC020073332026

Filing Number

CP/100108/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

CP/100237/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

B. Muralidhara Pai

Coram

B. Muralidhara Pai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CP ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BDK VALVES PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. SHRIDHAR PRABHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MALLAPPA GURUSIDDAPPA CHADICHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    B. Muralidhara PaiView PDF

    Case Summary: CP/100237/2026 Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: June 12, 2026 Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Muralidhara Pai Parties: - Petitioner: BDK Valves Private Limited - Respondent: Mallappa Gurusiddappa Chadichal (and 139 others in connected petitions) Decision The court dismissed all petitions. Key Facts - BDK Valves terminated services of 140 workers on November 27, 2024, citing grave misconduct from participation in an illegal strike - Workers filed individual industrial disputes before the Labour Court, Hubballi - The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 came into force on November 21, 2025, replacing the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Core Issue Whether pending industrial disputes before Labour Courts should be transferred to Industrial Tribunals under the new Code, or continue before existing Labour Courts. Court's Reasoning The court held that: 1. Existing authorities continue functioning: Central Government's Removal of Difficulties Orders (dated 08.12.2025 and 02.02.2026) clarify that existing Labour Courts and statutory authorities shall continue functioning until corresponding authorities are appointed under the Code 2. Purpose: To ensure continuity of adjudication and avoid legal/administrative vacuum 3. Section 24 CPC inapplicable: Labour Courts aren't subordinate civil courts; Section 24 CPC cannot transfer proceedings from specialized tribunals 4. No grounds for transfer: Articles 226-227 relief only available on grounds of bias or denial of natural justice—not mere procedural concerns Result: Labour Court, Hubballi retains jurisdiction to continue proceedings under the transitional framework. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Orders

    B. Muralidhara Pai

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/100237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CP/100237/2026 Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: June 12, 2026 Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Muralidhara Pai Parties: - Petitioner: BDK Valves Private Limited - Respondent: Mallappa Gurusiddappa Chadichal (and 139 others in connected petitions) Decision The court dismissed all petitions. Key Facts - BDK Valves terminated services of 140 workers on November 27, 2024, citing grave misconduct from participation in an illegal strike - Workers filed individual industrial disputes before the Labour Court, Hubballi - The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 came into force on November 21, 2025, replacing the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Core Issue Whether pending industrial disputes before Labour Courts should be transferred to Industrial Tribunals under the new Code, or continue before existing Labour Courts. Court's Reasoning The court held that: 1. Existing authorities continue functioning: Central Government's Removal of Difficulties Orders (dated 08.12.2025 and 02.02.2026) clarify that existing Labour Courts and statutory authorities shall continue functioning until corresponding authorities are appointed under the Code 2. Purpose: To ensure continuity of adjudication and avoid legal/administrative vacuum 3. Section 24 CPC inapplicable: Labour Courts aren't subordinate civil courts; Section 24 CPC cannot transfer proceedings from specialized tribunals 4. No grounds for transfer: Articles 226-227 relief only available on grounds of bias or denial of natural justice—not mere procedural concerns Result: Labour Court, Hubballi retains jurisdiction to continue proceedings under the transitional framework. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case