RAGHUNATH S/O RAMAPPA GUJJER vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.RP/100122/2020
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th June 2025.
CNR: KAHC020069362020
Filing Number
CRL.RP/100122/2020
Filing Date
01-Jun-2020
Registration No
CRL.RP/100122/2020
Registration Date
01-Jun-2020
Judge
K V Aravind
Coram
K V Aravind
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.RP ( 114 )
Sub-Category
397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)-U/S 397/-U/S 438 ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
13-Jun-2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAGHUNATH S/O RAMAPPA GUJJER
Adv. HARSHAWARDHANAGOUDA PATIL, M H PATIL,,,
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
K V AravindView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Karnataka granted the petitioner three weeks additional time to deposit a Rs. 1,00,000 fine (originally imposed with one-year imprisonment as default penalty), with Rs. 50,000 due within one week and the balance within two weeks, citing his custody status. The court also imposed Rs. 5,000 additional costs for the delay, to be released to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jun-2025
K V AravindView PDF
-
13-Jun-2025
Final Hearing
K V Aravind
-
12-Jun-2025
Final Hearing
K V Aravind
-
20-Apr-2021
Admission
M.g.uma
-
06-Apr-2021
Admission
M.g.uma
-
26-Mar-2021
Admission
M.g.uma
-
16-Mar-2021
Admission
M.g.uma
-
08-Dec-2020
Admission
Pradeep Singh Yerur
-
12-Oct-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Oct-2020
Admission
Pradeep Singh Yerur
-
12-Oct-2020
Admission
V.srishananda
-
01-Jun-2020
Case filed
Registration No. CRL.RP/100122/2020
Summary: The High Court of Karnataka granted the petitioner three weeks additional time to deposit a Rs. 1,00,000 fine (originally imposed with one-year imprisonment as default penalty), with Rs. 50,000 due within one week and the balance within two weeks, citing his custody status. The court also imposed Rs. 5,000 additional costs for the delay, to be released to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts