SHANTA W/O NELSON KAMAT vs VASANT BHIMARAO KAMAT, — RFA/100046/2017

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Jul-2017

CNR: KAHC020058662017

Filing Number

RFA/100046/2017

Filing Date

07-Feb-2017

Registration No

RFA/100046/2017

Registration Date

07-Feb-2017

Judge

H.p.sandesh , B. Muralidhara Pai

Coram

H.p.sandesh , B. Muralidhara Pai

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

RFA ( 132 )

Sub-Category

DEC/INJ-Declaration/Injunction ( 87 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANTA W/O NELSON KAMAT

    Adv. ARUN L NEELOPANT, SHRIHARISH A NEELOPANT,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,2.

  2. 2.MADHULATA D/O NELSON KAMAT 3.

  3. 3.SUNITA W/O MOHAN KALKOTI4.

  4. 4.HEMALATHA W/O LEMOOVEL JADI5.

  5. 5.SUREKHA W/O ROCKY ROJARIO6.

  6. 6.SUNIL S/O NELSON KAMAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VASANT BHIMARAO KAMAT,

    Adv. B R BHAT C/R1-R5,CP 20010/17,(NOTE: CAVEAT RETURNED WITH,OFFICE OBJECTION),AHAMED ALI RAHIMANSHAH,FOR R13 (VK FILED),MANOHAR HOSEA FOR R18,APPEAL DISMISSED AS AGAINST,R6-R8, R10, R11, R15, R17, R19,R21 & R29 (V/O DTD 09/12/

  2. 2.,R9- ELIZABETH - SERVED,R12- MOULASAB - SERVED,R14- PRABHAKAR RAO - SERVED,R16- NARAYAN - SERVED,R20- KHALANDAR - SERVED,R22- INDUBAI - SERVED,R23- SOMASHEKHAR - SERVED,R24- SHIVARAJI - SERVED,R25- BASAPPA - SERVED,R26- MALLAPPA - SERVED,R27- MANJUNATH - SERVED,R28- BASAMMA- SERVED,R30- SHRISHAILAPPA - SERVED,R31- SUBAS - SERVED,R32- KHANASAB - SERVED 1123

  3. 3.ARUN S/O VASANT KAMAT,

  4. 4.AJAY S/O VASANT KAMAT,

  5. 5.SUMAN JULIUS

  6. 6.HEMA JAYAKUMAR,

  7. 7.SMKT.KANTA W/O RAICHARD KAMAT,

  8. 8.RAVI S/O RICHARD KAMAT,

  9. 9.SURESH ALBERT COURUPALIS

  10. 10.ELIZABETH

  11. 11.SMT. MARIN W/O ALBERT COURPALIS

  12. 12.NAZEER AHAMAD HASENSAB NOOLVI,

  13. 13.MOULASAB MAKTUMSAB TOREGAL,

  14. 14.TABEETA

  15. 15.PRABHAKAR

  16. 16.BABAJAN

  17. 17.NARAYAN

  18. 18.SMT.SHILLA

  19. 19.REVEREND DEVANDAN T. KONESAGAR,

  20. 20.AKSHA DEVENDAR KONESAGAR,

  21. 21.KHALANDAR

  22. 22.SMT.SARISBAI

  23. 23.SMT.INDUBAI

  24. 24.SOMESHEKAR

  25. 25.SHIVAJI

  26. 26.BASAPPA GARAGAPPA AKKI,

  27. 27.SHARADA BAI

  28. 28.MANJUNATH

  29. 29.BASAMMA

  30. 30.TEJASHWINI

  31. 31.SHRISHAILAPPA NAGAPPA SURIBAN,

  32. 32.SUBAS S/O BHARAMAPPA NEERALKERI,

  33. 33.KHANSAB S/O HASANSAB PINJAR,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    H.p.sandesh,b. Muralidhara PaiView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: RFA/100046/2017 High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dismissed plaintiff's appeal, finding that defendants-brothers jointly acquired the disputed Dharwad property with plaintiff, and thus held valid rights over portions they alienated. The court upheld that the repealed Urban Land Ceiling Act orders granting each brother equal retention rights survived repeal and were not contradicted by plaintiff's long delay in challenging them. Trial court's judgment in plaintiff's favor was set aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Further Arguments

    H.p.sandesh , B. Muralidhara Pai

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    H.p.sandesh , B. Muralidhara Pai

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Mohammad Nawaz , Geetha K.B.

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Mohammad Nawaz , Geetha K.B.

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Mohammad Nawaz , Geetha K.B.

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Mohammad Nawaz , Geetha K.B.

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Mohammad Nawaz , Geetha K.B.

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    Orders

    R.devdas , B. Muralidhara Pai

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Orders

    R.devdas , B. Muralidhara Pai

  12. 14-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing

    R.devdas , B. Muralidhara Pai

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    Final Hearing

    R.nataraj , Rajesh Rai K

  14. 25-Jul-2025

    Final Hearing

    R.nataraj , Rajesh Rai K

  15. 24-Jul-2025

    Final Hearing

    R.nataraj , Rajesh Rai K

  16. 23-Jul-2025

    Final Hearing

    R.nataraj , Rajesh Rai K

  17. 05-Sep-2024

    Orders

    B.m.shyam Prasad , C M Joshi

  18. 19-Aug-2024

    Orders

    B.m.shyam Prasad , C M Joshi

  19. 05-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    B.m.shyam Prasad , C M Joshi

  20. 21-Nov-2023

    Orders

    H.p.sandesh , Ramachandra D. Huddar

  21. 16-Nov-2023

    Final Hearing

    H.p.sandesh , Ramachandra D. Huddar

  22. 18-Jan-2023

    Orders

    Suraj Govindaraj , G Basavaraja

  23. 30-Sep-2022

    Orders

    B.m.shyam Prasad , G Basavaraja

  24. 11-Jul-2022

    Hearing - Interlocutory Appln

    K.s.mudagal , M.G.S. Kamal

  25. 24-Sep-2020

    Orders

    B.m.shyam Prasad , M.g.uma

  26. 24-Sep-2020

    Orders

    B.m.shyam Prasad , M.g.uma

  27. 14-Sep-2020

    Orders

    B.m.shyam Prasad , M.g.uma

  28. 04-Mar-2020

    Orders

    M.i.arun , B.a.patil

  29. 24-Feb-2020

    Orders

    K.s.mudagal , Jyoti M

  30. 19-Feb-2020

    Orders

    K.s.mudagal , Jyoti M

  31. 17-Feb-2020

    Admission

    Pradeep Singh Yerur , K.n.phaneendra

  32. 05-Feb-2020

    Admission

    K.s.mudagal , Jyoti M

  33. 22-Jan-2020

    Admission

    K.s.mudagal , Suraj Govindaraj

  34. 09-Dec-2019

    Admission

    Nataraj Rangaswamy , P.b.bajanthri

  35. 18-Nov-2019

    Admission

    Nataraj Rangaswamy , P.b.bajanthri

  36. 15-Nov-2018

    Admission

    B.v.nagarathna , Bellunke.a.s.

  37. 05-Nov-2018

    Admission

    Mohammad Nawaz , B.v.nagarathna

  38. 11-Sep-2018

    —

    Unknown

  39. 11-Sep-2018

    —

    K.somashekar

  40. 11-Sep-2018

    Admission

    Krishna S.dixit

  41. 30-Nov-2017

    Admission

    K.s.mudagal

  42. 21-Sep-2017

    Admission

    Sreenivas Harish Kumar

  43. 04-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 07-Feb-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA/100046/2017

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: RFA/100046/2017 High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dismissed plaintiff's appeal, finding that defendants-brothers jointly acquired the disputed Dharwad property with plaintiff, and thus held valid rights over portions they alienated. The court upheld that the repealed Urban Land Ceiling Act orders granting each brother equal retention rights survived repeal and were not contradicted by plaintiff's long delay in challenging them. Trial court's judgment in plaintiff's favor was set aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case