RAM COMPUTERS vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WA/100154/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC020052192026

Filing Number

WA/100172/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

WA/100154/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

Coram

B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 145 )

Sub-Category

TEN-Contract/Tender ( 130 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM COMPUTERS

    Adv. YADAWAD GIRISH ARUN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

  2. 2.THE DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT

  3. 3.THE DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Karnataka allowed Ram Computers' writ appeal and permitted the proprietorship firm to submit its bid for a government manpower services tender by 4:00 PM, despite the tender notification restricting participation to societies or cooperative societies. The court found that restricting competition violated principles of level playing field and open competition, and directed authorities to receive and evaluate the bid subject to the writ court's final decision on whether the earlier tender cancellation and participation restrictions were justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/100154/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Karnataka allowed Ram Computers' writ appeal and permitted the proprietorship firm to submit its bid for a government manpower services tender by 4:00 PM, despite the tender notification restricting participation to societies or cooperative societies. The court found that restricting competition violated principles of level playing field and open competition, and directed authorities to receive and evaluate the bid subject to the writ court's final decision on whether the earlier tender cancellation and participation restrictions were justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case