RAM COMPUTERS vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WA /100154/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4,. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: KAHC020052192026
Filing Number
WA /100172/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Registration No
WA /100154/2026
Registration Date
23-03-2026
Judge
B.M.SHYAM PRASAD , SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
Coram
B.M.SHYAM PRASAD , SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WA ( 145 )
Sub-Category
TEN-Contract/Tender ( 130 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAM COMPUTERS
Adv. YADAWAD GIRISH ARUN
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT
THE DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: B.M.SHYAM PRASAD , SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
PRELIMINARY HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | PRELIMINARY HEARING |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Karnataka allowed Ram Computers' writ appeal and permitted the proprietorship firm to submit its bid for a government manpower services tender by 4:00 PM, despite the tender notification restricting participation to societies or cooperative societies. The court found that restricting competition violated principles of level playing field and open competition, and directed authorities to receive and evaluate the bid subject to the writ court's final decision on whether the earlier tender cancellation and participation restrictions were justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Karnataka allowed Ram Computers' writ appeal and permitted the proprietorship firm to submit its bid for a government manpower services tender by 4:00 PM, despite the tender notification restricting participation to societies or cooperative societies. The court found that restricting competition violated principles of level playing field and open competition, and directed authorities to receive and evaluate the bid subject to the writ court's final decision on whether the earlier tender cancellation and participation restrictions were justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts