P C KURIYAN S/O P C CHUMMAR vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER — WA/100137/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC020045062026

Filing Number

WA/100140/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

WA/100137/2026

Registration Date

14-Mar-2026

Judge

B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

Coram

B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 145 )

Sub-Category

PP-Kar.Pub.Premises(Evn.of unauthrd occ)Act ( 138 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P C KURIYAN S/O P C CHUMMAR

    Adv. VANTI MAHAMMAD SHARIF LATIF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF

    Summary The Karnataka High Court dismissed the writ appeal challenging an eviction order against unauthorized occupants on railway property in Toranagallu. The court confirmed that appellants are unauthorized occupants of railway land (Survey No.321/A/1) and are not entitled to retain possession, but granted them six months to vacate and hand over vacant possession to the Railway authorities, while directing alternative rehabilitation/accommodation be provided if not already allotted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Ph In Hearing Matters-2:30 Pm

    B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/100137/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Karnataka High Court dismissed the writ appeal challenging an eviction order against unauthorized occupants on railway property in Toranagallu. The court confirmed that appellants are unauthorized occupants of railway land (Survey No.321/A/1) and are not entitled to retain possession, but granted them six months to vacate and hand over vacant possession to the Railway authorities, while directing alternative rehabilitation/accommodation be provided if not already allotted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case