THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER vs LAXMAN S/O BHIMAPPA TOTAGI — MFA/100754/2025
Case under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act Section 74. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: KAHC020042472025
e-Filing Number
18-02-2025
Filing Number
MFA/100918/2025
Filing Date
19-Feb-2025
Registration No
MFA/100754/2025
Registration Date
03-Mar-2025
Judge
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
Coram
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MFA ( 124 )
Sub-Category
LAC-RFCTLARR (Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition , rehabilitation and resettlement act) ( 77 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Adv. GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE
-
2.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. Advocate General Office
Respondent(s)
-
1.LAXMAN S/O BHIMAPPA TOTAGI
-
2.THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER,
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Admission
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing - Interlocutory Appln
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
-
26-Mar-2026
B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad adjourned nine connected appeals (MFA Nos. 105092/2024 and others) to 16.04.2026 at 2:30 p.m. upon a request by the counsel for the appellant, as the lead Senior Counsel was personally inconvenienced. The court directed the office to re-list all appeals on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Admission - 2:30 Pm
B.m.shyam Prasad , Shivashankar Amarannavar
-
12-Mar-2026
B.m.shyam Prasad,shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF
-
03-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MFA/100754/2025
Summary: The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad adjourned nine connected appeals (MFA Nos. 105092/2024 and others) to 16.04.2026 at 2:30 p.m. upon a request by the counsel for the appellant, as the lead Senior Counsel was personally inconvenienced. The court directed the office to re-list all appeals on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts