SMT. TANGEVVA D/O. NEELAPPA ARER, vs MALTESHAPPA S/O. NEELAPPA ARER, — WP/101900/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC020037442025

Filing Number

WP/101262/2025

Filing Date

12-Feb-2025

Registration No

WP/101900/2025

Registration Date

19-Mar-2025

Judge

Jyoti M

Coram

Jyoti M

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

RES-Residuary ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. TANGEVVA D/O. NEELAPPA ARER,

    Adv. UDAYASHANKAR SHINDHE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MALTESHAPPA S/O. NEELAPPA ARER,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jul-2026

    Orders

    Addl. Registrar Judicial

  3. 23-Jun-2026

    Dismissal

    Addl. Registrar Judicial

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Jyoti MView PDF

    The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition filed by Smt. Tangevva against private individual Malteshappa, holding that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable against private individuals as they do not constitute "State" under Article 12. The court found the petition lacking in jurisdiction and accordingly dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 3Rd Time

    Addl. Registrar Judicial

  6. 09-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/101900/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition filed by Smt. Tangevva against private individual Malteshappa, holding that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable against private individuals as they do not constitute "State" under Article 12. The court found the petition lacking in jurisdiction and accordingly dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case