M/S BANGARI FILLING STATION vs THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, — WP/101168/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC020026872026
Filing Number
WP/101194/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/101168/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Judge
Ashok S. Kinagi
Coram
Ashok S. Kinagi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
POLICE-Karnataka Police Act ( 37 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S BANGARI FILLING STATION
Adv. HARISH S MAIGUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
-
3.THE COMMISSIONER,
-
4.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
-
5.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
-
6.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
-
7.THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR,
-
8.THE CHIEF DIVISIONAL RETAILS SALES MANAGER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Ashok S. KinagiView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Ashok S. KinagiView PDF
Summary The Karnataka High Court dismissed Bangari Filling Station's writ petition challenging a notice from the Deputy Commissioner of Police calling for a joint inquiry regarding alleged land encroachment. The court held the petition premature since it was filed before the petitioner appeared before the authority and found no grounds to entertain a writ against a mere inquiry notice. However, the court reserved liberty for the petitioner to submit documents within three days, directing the police to consider them and pass appropriate orders within one week without taking coercive action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
Ashok S. Kinagi
-
16-Mar-2026
Preliminary Hearing
K.s.hemalekha
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/101168/2026
Summary The Karnataka High Court dismissed Bangari Filling Station's writ petition challenging a notice from the Deputy Commissioner of Police calling for a joint inquiry regarding alleged land encroachment. The court held the petition premature since it was filed before the petitioner appeared before the authority and found no grounds to entertain a writ against a mere inquiry notice. However, the court reserved liberty for the petitioner to submit documents within three days, directing the police to consider them and pass appropriate orders within one week without taking coercive action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts