MARUTI S/O. PARAMANAND MADAMAGERI vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.A/100053/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code1 Section 302,201. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC020016512024
Filing Number
CRL.A/100051/2024
Filing Date
23-Jan-2024
Registration No
CRL.A/100053/2024
Registration Date
05-Feb-2024
Judge
H.p.sandesh , B. Muralidhara Pai
Coram
H.p.sandesh , B. Muralidhara Pai
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRL.A ( 110 )
Sub-Category
C-Convicted ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MARUTI S/O. PARAMANAND MADAMAGERI
Adv. SRINIVAS NAIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
H.p.sandesh,b. Muralidhara PaiView PDF
Summary The Karnataka High Court at Dharwad allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted accused Maruti of murder (IPC §302) and evidence tampering (IPC §201). The court found material contradictions in prosecution witnesses' testimonies, unreliable eyewitness evidence, and unproven motive, determining the conviction lacked credible circumstantial evidence required under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Dec-2025
Final Hearing
R.devdas , B. Muralidhara Pai
-
12-Nov-2025
Final Hearing
R.devdas , B. Muralidhara Pai
-
17-Sep-2025
Final Hearing
S.R. Krishna Kumar , C.M. Poonacha
-
01-Sep-2025
Final Hearing
S.R. Krishna Kumar , C.M. Poonacha
-
15-Jul-2025
Final Hearing - 8
R.devdas , K V Aravind
-
10-Jun-2025
Final Hearing
R.nataraj , Rajesh Rai K
-
09-Jun-2025
Final Hearing
R.nataraj , Rajesh Rai K
-
05-Jun-2025
Final Hearing
R.nataraj , Rajesh Rai K
-
04-Jun-2025
Final Hearing
R.nataraj , Rajesh Rai K
-
08-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CRL.A/100053/2024
Summary The Karnataka High Court at Dharwad allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted accused Maruti of murder (IPC §302) and evidence tampering (IPC §201). The court found material contradictions in prosecution witnesses' testimonies, unreliable eyewitness evidence, and unproven motive, determining the conviction lacked credible circumstantial evidence required under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts