M/S. ELECTRICAL ENERGY EQUIPMENTS INDIA PVT. LTD., vs M/S. VISUAL TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - VIKHAR AHMED B — CMP/767/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 11. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: KAHC010842112025

Filing Number

CMP/756/2025

Filing Date

19-Dec-2025

Registration No

CMP/767/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Judge

B M Shyam Prasad

Coram

B M Shyam Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. ELECTRICAL ENERGY EQUIPMENTS INDIA PVT. LTD.,

    Adv. SHREEHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. VISUAL TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - VIKHAR AHMED B

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Admission

    B M Shyam Prasad

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    B M Shyam PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary - CMP 767/2025 The High Court of Karnataka hearing between M/S. Electrical Energy Equipments India Pvt. Ltd. and M/S. Visual Technologies India Private Limited on 11.06.2026 resulted in an adjournment. Justice B M Shyam Prasad directed the court office to re-list the petition on 18.06.2026, as requested by petitioner's counsel and after informing respondent's Senior Counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Admission

    E.s.indiresh

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Ashok S.kinagi

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/767/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - CMP 767/2025 The High Court of Karnataka hearing between M/S. Electrical Energy Equipments India Pvt. Ltd. and M/S. Visual Technologies India Private Limited on 11.06.2026 resulted in an adjournment. Justice B M Shyam Prasad directed the court office to re-list the petition on 18.06.2026, as requested by petitioner's counsel and after informing respondent's Senior Counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case