SRI VIKAS S @ MALLIKARJUNA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/17256/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code1 Section 143,144,146,147,148,302,149. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC010831862025
Filing Number
CRL.P/16870/2025
Filing Date
16-12-2025
Registration No
CRL.P/17256/2025
Registration Date
18-12-2025
Judge
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Coram
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.P ( 112 )
Sub-Category
439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)-U/S 439/-U/S 483 ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI VIKAS S @ MALLIKARJUNA
Adv. MANJUNATH V
Respondent(s)
STATE OF KARNATAKA
Hearing History
Judge: M.NAGAPRASANNA
NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-01-2026 | NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME |
Orders
Summary: CRL.P No. 17256/2025 The High Court of Karnataka allowed Vikas S's petition to restore his bail in a 2018 murder and rioting case (charges under IPC §143, 302, 144, 146, 147 r/w 149). The petitioner's previously granted bail was cancelled due to non-appearance before the trial court on a non-bailable warrant. Justice M. Nagaprasanna restored the bail originally granted on 23-10-2019, with the same conditions, on grounds that the petitioner had been granted bail earlier and the cancellation was solely based on non-appearance, directing him to appear as and when the court directs or the matter is listed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: CRL.P No. 17256/2025 The High Court of Karnataka allowed Vikas S's petition to restore his bail in a 2018 murder and rioting case (charges under IPC §143, 302, 144, 146, 147 r/w 149). The petitioner's previously granted bail was cancelled due to non-appearance before the trial court on a non-bailable warrant. Justice M. Nagaprasanna restored the bail originally granted on 23-10-2019, with the same conditions, on grounds that the petitioner had been granted bail earlier and the cancellation was solely based on non-appearance, directing him to appear as and when the court directs or the matter is listed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts