SRI. JAGADISH. B. S. vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/17035/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,133,118(1),74,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010817752025

Filing Number

CRL.P/16674/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRL.P/17035/2025

Registration Date

15-Dec-2025

Judge

M.nagaprasanna

Coram

M.nagaprasanna

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS)-U/S 438/-U/S 482 ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,133,118(1),74,351(2),3(5)
The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI. JAGADISH. B. S.

    Adv. VIJAYA RAJAARSU R

  2. 2.SMT. SAVITHRAMMA

  3. 3.SMT. THAYAMMA

  4. 4.SMT. NEELAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    M.nagaprasannaView PDF

    The High Court of Karnataka granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners in a family dispute case registered under Sections 352, 133, 118(1), 74, 351(2) of the BNS 2023 and Sections 3-4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Justice M. Nagaprasanna found the offences did not warrant imprisonment exceeding 10 years and characterized the matter as a family dispute blown into a criminal complaint, thereby entitling the petitioners to bail subject to conditions including Rs. 50,000 personal bond each, non-interference with investigation, cooperation with police, jurisdiction restrictions, and bi-weekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Dec-2025

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    The Registrar Computers

  4. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.P/17035/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners in a family dispute case registered under Sections 352, 133, 118(1), 74, 351(2) of the BNS 2023 and Sections 3-4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Justice M. Nagaprasanna found the offences did not warrant imprisonment exceeding 10 years and characterized the matter as a family dispute blown into a criminal complaint, thereby entitling the petitioners to bail subject to conditions including Rs. 50,000 personal bond each, non-interference with investigation, cooperation with police, jurisdiction restrictions, and bi-weekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case