SRI. JAGADISH. B. S. vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/17035/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,133,118(1),74,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC010817752025
Filing Number
CRL.P/16674/2025
Filing Date
11-12-2025
Registration No
CRL.P/17035/2025
Registration Date
15-12-2025
Judge
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Coram
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.P ( 112 )
Sub-Category
438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS)-U/S 438/-U/S 482 ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI. JAGADISH. B. S.
Adv. VIJAYA RAJAARSU R
SMT. SAVITHRAMMA
SMT. THAYAMMA
SMT. NEELAMMA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Hearing History
Judge: M.NAGAPRASANNA
NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-12-2025 | NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME |
Orders
The High Court of Karnataka granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners in a family dispute case registered under Sections 352, 133, 118(1), 74, 351(2) of the BNS 2023 and Sections 3-4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Justice M. Nagaprasanna found the offences did not warrant imprisonment exceeding 10 years and characterized the matter as a family dispute blown into a criminal complaint, thereby entitling the petitioners to bail subject to conditions including Rs. 50,000 personal bond each, non-interference with investigation, cooperation with police, jurisdiction restrictions, and bi-weekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Karnataka granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners in a family dispute case registered under Sections 352, 133, 118(1), 74, 351(2) of the BNS 2023 and Sections 3-4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Justice M. Nagaprasanna found the offences did not warrant imprisonment exceeding 10 years and characterized the matter as a family dispute blown into a criminal complaint, thereby entitling the petitioners to bail subject to conditions including Rs. 50,000 personal bond each, non-interference with investigation, cooperation with police, jurisdiction restrictions, and bi-weekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts