H V V VALLEY RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (R) vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — WP/36672/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: KAHC010786772025

Filing Number

WP/36510/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

WP/36672/2025

Registration Date

03-Dec-2025

Judge

B M Shyam Prasad

Coram

B M Shyam Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

BMP-Bangalore Mahanagara Palike ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.H V V VALLEY RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (R)

    Adv. V S HEGDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KARNATAKA

  2. 2.THE JOINT COMMISSIONER/ZONAL

    Adv. VAIBHAV RAVI MALIMATH

  3. 3.THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE

    Adv. VAIBHAV RAVI MALIMATH

  4. 4.THE REVENUE OFFICER

    Adv. VAIBHAV RAVI MALIMATH

  5. 5.V.SHRUTHI SHANKAR

    Adv. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH

  6. 6.MOHSIN SHARIFF

    Adv. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Orders

    B M Shyam Prasad

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    B M Shyam PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: The petition was amended with court's permission. The case was adjourned to 12.06.2026 for the respondents to file a required report within one week. The court warned that if the report is not filed, the concerned officer must appear to explain non-compliance, or adverse orders may be passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Orders

    M.i.arun

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Hearing - Interlocutory Appln

    M.i.arun

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/36672/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The petition was amended with court's permission. The case was adjourned to 12.06.2026 for the respondents to file a required report within one week. The court warned that if the report is not filed, the concerned officer must appear to explain non-compliance, or adverse orders may be passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case