SRI. RAGHUNATH K R vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — WP/36516/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010753782024
Filing Number
WP/35439/2024
Filing Date
20-Dec-2024
Registration No
WP/36516/2024
Registration Date
31-Dec-2024
Judge
Chief Justice , K.S. Hemalekha
Coram
Chief Justice , K.S. Hemalekha
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
MM_S-Mines/Minerals-State ( 42 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI. RAGHUNATH K R
Adv. VIVEK HOLLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
2.THE DIRECTOR,
-
3.THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS,
-
4.THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER,
-
5.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Preliminary Hearing(ready In Notice)
Chief Justice , K.S. Hemalekha
-
05-Jun-2026
Chief Justice,k.s. HemalekhaView PDF
Case Summary: WP 36516/2024 The writ petition filed by Sri. Raghunath K R against the State of Karnataka and forest department officials was heard by the High Court of Karnataka on 05.06.2026. The court adjourned the case and listed it for further hearing on 08.06.2026 at the request of the Additional Government Advocate representing the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Preliminary Hearing(ready In Notice)
Chief Justice , C.M. Poonacha
-
15-Apr-2026
Preliminary Hearing(ready In Notice)
Chief Justice , C.M. Poonacha
-
05-Mar-2026
Green Bench Matter/S
Chief Justice , C.M. Poonacha
-
28-Nov-2025
Revoked
The Registrar (Judicial)
-
21-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WP/36516/2024
Case Summary: WP 36516/2024 The writ petition filed by Sri. Raghunath K R against the State of Karnataka and forest department officials was heard by the High Court of Karnataka on 05.06.2026. The court adjourned the case and listed it for further hearing on 08.06.2026 at the request of the Additional Government Advocate representing the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts