JAYANTH RAO vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/15841/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code1 Section 376D,302,323,326,34. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed for Non-Prosecution on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010753432025

Filing Number

CRL.P/15500/2025

Filing Date

17-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRL.P/15841/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Judge

S Vishwajith Shetty

Coram

S Vishwajith Shetty

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)-U/S 439/-U/S 483 ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code1 Section 376D,302,323,326,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYANTH RAO

    Adv. PANDURANGA.G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KARNATAKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    S Vishwajith ShettyView PDF

    In CRL.P 15841/2025, the Karnataka High Court dismissed Jayanth Rao's bail petition for non-prosecution. Rao, aged 20 and in judicial custody, had sought bail in a case involving charges under IPC sections 376D, 302, 323, 326, and 34 (serious offenses including rape and murder). The court found that despite being listed six times and a peremptory order issued on 03.06.2026, the petitioner failed to comply with office objections and showed no interest in pursuing the petition, leading to its dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 6Th Time

    S Vishwajith Shetty

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 5Th Time

    S Vishwajith Shetty

  5. 25-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.P/15841/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In CRL.P 15841/2025, the Karnataka High Court dismissed Jayanth Rao's bail petition for non-prosecution. Rao, aged 20 and in judicial custody, had sought bail in a case involving charges under IPC sections 376D, 302, 323, 326, and 34 (serious offenses including rape and murder). The court found that despite being listed six times and a peremptory order issued on 03.06.2026, the petitioner failed to comply with office objections and showed no interest in pursuing the petition, leading to its dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case