JAYANTH RAO vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/15841/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code1 Section 376D,302,323,326,34. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed for Non-Prosecution on 12th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010753432025
Filing Number
CRL.P/15500/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
CRL.P/15841/2025
Registration Date
18-11-2025
Judge
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
Coram
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.P ( 112 )
Sub-Category
439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)-U/S 439/-U/S 483 ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYANTH RAO
Adv. PANDURANGA.G
Respondent(s)
STATE OF KARNATAKA
Hearing History
Judge: S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME
NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 6TH TIME
NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 5TH TIME
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-11-2025 | NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME |
| 12-06-2026 | NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 6TH TIME |
| 05-06-2026 | NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 5TH TIME |
Orders
In CRL.P 15841/2025, the Karnataka High Court dismissed Jayanth Rao's bail petition for non-prosecution. Rao, aged 20 and in judicial custody, had sought bail in a case involving charges under IPC sections 376D, 302, 323, 326, and 34 (serious offenses including rape and murder). The court found that despite being listed six times and a peremptory order issued on 03.06.2026, the petitioner failed to comply with office objections and showed no interest in pursuing the petition, leading to its dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In CRL.P 15841/2025, the Karnataka High Court dismissed Jayanth Rao's bail petition for non-prosecution. Rao, aged 20 and in judicial custody, had sought bail in a case involving charges under IPC sections 376D, 302, 323, 326, and 34 (serious offenses including rape and murder). The court found that despite being listed six times and a peremptory order issued on 03.06.2026, the petitioner failed to comply with office objections and showed no interest in pursuing the petition, leading to its dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts