SRI V MOHAMMED SHABBIR vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — WP/32054/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CNR: KAHC010695262025
Filing Number
WP/32175/2025
Filing Date
23-Oct-2025
Registration No
WP/32054/2025
Registration Date
25-Oct-2025
Judge
B M Shyam Prasad
Coram
B M Shyam Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
RES-Residuary ( 91 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI V MOHAMMED SHABBIR
Adv. KARTHIK SURYAPRAKASH TAYUR
-
2.SRI. MOHAMMED IMRAN,
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
-
3.THE COMMISSIONER,
Adv. B L SANJEEV
-
4.SMT. SHAMSHAD,
Adv. SHANKAR H S,MALLIKARJUN BASAREDDY
-
5.SRI. MOHAMMED ASLAM,
Adv. SHANKAR H S,MALLIKARJUN BASAREDDY
-
6.SRI. MOHAMMED SHARIF,
Adv. SHANKAR H S,MALLIKARJUN BASAREDDY
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jul-2026
Orders
B M Shyam Prasad
-
05-Jun-2026
B M Shyam PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: In WP 32054/2025, petitioners Sri V Mohammed Shabbir and Sri Mohammed Imran challenged the cancellation of their Hakku Patra (land certificate) by the Tahsildar's order dated 20.02.2026. The High Court of Karnataka adjourned the petition to 17.07.2026 to allow the respondents to place their memo on record and the petitioners to file their response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Orders
M.i.arun
-
24-Apr-2026
Orders
M.i.arun
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing - Interlocutory Appln
M.i.arun
-
03-Nov-2025
Preliminary Hearing
R. Nataraj
-
27-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/32054/2025
Case Summary: In WP 32054/2025, petitioners Sri V Mohammed Shabbir and Sri Mohammed Imran challenged the cancellation of their Hakku Patra (land certificate) by the Tahsildar's order dated 20.02.2026. The High Court of Karnataka adjourned the petition to 17.07.2026 to allow the respondents to place their memo on record and the petitioners to file their response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts