M/S. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IT BUSINESS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEALS)-4 — STRP/54/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section none. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: KAHC010689492025

Filing Number

STRP/53/2025

Filing Date

17-Oct-2025

Registration No

STRP/54/2025

Registration Date

23-Oct-2025

Judge

S.g.pandit , K. V. Aravind

Coram

S.g.pandit , K. V. Aravind

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section none

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IT BUSINESS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. RAVI RAGHAVAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEALS)-4

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    S.g.pandit,k. V. AravindView PDF

    The petition filed by M/S. Schneider Electric IT Business India Private Limited against the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals)-4 has been admitted by the Karnataka High Court. The court will examine four substantial questions of law regarding whether the tribunal correctly relied on a Customs Act show cause notice to establish a best judgment assessment under KVAT Act, upheld CST levy without independent KVAT inquiry, confirmed CST demands on export sales returns without sufficient evidence, and upheld CST demands without establishing the basic ingredient of sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Admission

    S.g.pandit , K. V. Aravind

  4. 29-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. STRP/54/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The petition filed by M/S. Schneider Electric IT Business India Private Limited against the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals)-4 has been admitted by the Karnataka High Court. The court will examine four substantial questions of law regarding whether the tribunal correctly relied on a Customs Act show cause notice to establish a best judgment assessment under KVAT Act, upheld CST levy without independent KVAT inquiry, confirmed CST demands on export sales returns without sufficient evidence, and upheld CST demands without establishing the basic ingredient of sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case