SRI N R NARAYANAPPA vs THE UNION OF INDIA Advocate - AJAY PRABHU M — WP/27181/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010578432024

Filing Number

WP/27281/2024

Filing Date

30-Sep-2024

Registration No

WP/27181/2024

Registration Date

01-Oct-2024

Judge

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

Coram

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

RES-Residuary ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI N R NARAYANAPPA

    Adv. SHIVAPRAKASH M

  2. 2.SRI. MOHAN

  3. 3.SRI. G.R.MANJAPPA

  4. 4.SMT. LALITHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA Advocate - AJAY PRABHU M

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

    Adv. GA

  3. 3.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

    Adv. GA

  4. 4.THE CHAIRMAN NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

    Adv. GUHA ASSOCIATES P PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    S Sunil Dutt YadavView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/27181/2024 Court Decision: The Karnataka High Court dismissed both consolidated writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for a National Highway bypass project near Talaguppa-Marathur in Shivamogga District. Key Reasoning: The court found that petitioners failed to file objections within statutory deadlines under the National Highways Act, 1956, and that the bypass alignment decision—made by NHAI as an expert body—involved policy considerations (avoiding railway level crossings, sharp turns, and extensive demolitions in built-up areas) beyond the scope of judicial review absent illegality or mala fides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  8. 29-Aug-2025

    Preliminary Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  9. 12-Aug-2025

    Preliminary Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  10. 31-Jul-2025

    Orders

    M.nagaprasanna

  11. 29-Jul-2025

    Preliminary Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  12. 22-Jul-2025

    Preliminary Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  13. 16-Jul-2025

    Preliminary Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  14. 15-Jul-2025

    Preliminary Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  15. 11-Jul-2025

    Preliminary Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  16. 26-Jun-2025

    Admission

    M.nagaprasanna

  17. 26-Jun-2025

    Preliminary Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  18. 19-Jun-2025

    Orders

    M.nagaprasanna

  19. 17-Jun-2025

    Preliminary Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  20. 27-Feb-2025

    Orders

    M.G.S. Kamal

  21. 10-Feb-2025

    Orders

    M.G.S. Kamal

  22. 24-Jan-2025

    Orders

    M.G.S. Kamal

  23. 20-Jan-2025

    Orders

    M.G.S. Kamal

  24. 14-Oct-2024

    Orders

    M.i.arun

  25. 01-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 30-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/27181/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/27181/2024 Court Decision: The Karnataka High Court dismissed both consolidated writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for a National Highway bypass project near Talaguppa-Marathur in Shivamogga District. Key Reasoning: The court found that petitioners failed to file objections within statutory deadlines under the National Highways Act, 1956, and that the bypass alignment decision—made by NHAI as an expert body—involved policy considerations (avoiding railway level crossings, sharp turns, and extensive demolitions in built-up areas) beyond the scope of judicial review absent illegality or mala fides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case