BABBAROLLA THILAK vs STATE BY — CRL.P/10303/2025

Case under The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8C,20 b,ii,C,28,29. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed for Non-Prosecution on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010472852025

Filing Number

CRL.P/9978/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

CRL.P/10303/2025

Registration Date

18-Jul-2025

Judge

S Vishwajith Shetty

Coram

S Vishwajith Shetty

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)-U/S 439/-U/S 483 ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8C,20 b,ii,C,28,29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABBAROLLA THILAK

    Adv. MANJUNATHA B T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE BY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    S Vishwajith ShettyView PDF

    The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Babbarolla Thilak's bail petition (filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023) for non-prosecution. Despite being listed for the sixth time and a prior peremptory order on 03.06.2026, the petitioner failed to comply with office objections and did not appear for hearing, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the bail application in his NDPS Act case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 6Th Time

    S Vishwajith Shetty

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 6Th Time

    S Vishwajith Shetty

  5. 21-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.P/10303/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Babbarolla Thilak's bail petition (filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023) for non-prosecution. Despite being listed for the sixth time and a prior peremptory order on 03.06.2026, the petitioner failed to comply with office objections and did not appear for hearing, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the bail application in his NDPS Act case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case