MR SYED SHOAIB vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY — CRL.P/9524/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code1 Section 506, 34, 504, 376, 323, 420, 313, 417. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010440602025
Filing Number
CRL.P/9186/2025
Filing Date
03-Jul-2025
Registration No
CRL.P/9524/2025
Registration Date
07-Jul-2025
Judge
M.nagaprasanna
Coram
M.nagaprasanna
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.P ( 112 )
Sub-Category
482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-U/S 482/-U/S 528 ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MR SYED SHOAIB
Adv. KARIAPPA N.A
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
-
2.CHIEF SPUERINTENDENT
Adv. SHIVAPRASAD B SAJJAN
-
3.MRS KAVI VERMA
Adv. ABDUL MAJID,NISHAD S A
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
M.nagaprasannaView PDF
Case Summary: CRL.P/9524/2025 - Syed Shoaib v. State of Karnataka The Karnataka High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to quash an FIR alleging rape, cheating, fraud, criminal intimidation, and forced abortion. The court found serious triable issues requiring investigation: the complainant alleged a 10-year relationship involving deception (fake marriage while petitioner was already married), forced religious conversion, financial exploitation (~60-70 lakhs), forced abortions, death threats, and blackmail using intimate videos, despite the relationship's apparent consensuality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2026
Admission
Mohammad Nawaz
-
17-Dec-2025
Orders
Mohammad Nawaz
-
19-Nov-2025
Orders
Mohammad Nawaz
-
06-Nov-2025
Orders
Sachin Shankar Magadum
-
28-Aug-2025
Orders
S.r.krishna Kumar
-
06-Aug-2025
Orders
S.r.krishna Kumar
-
24-Jul-2025
Orders
S.r.krishna Kumar
-
08-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRL.P/9524/2025
Case Summary: CRL.P/9524/2025 - Syed Shoaib v. State of Karnataka The Karnataka High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to quash an FIR alleging rape, cheating, fraud, criminal intimidation, and forced abortion. The court found serious triable issues requiring investigation: the complainant alleged a 10-year relationship involving deception (fake marriage while petitioner was already married), forced religious conversion, financial exploitation (~60-70 lakhs), forced abortions, death threats, and blackmail using intimate videos, despite the relationship's apparent consensuality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts