MR SYED SHOAIB vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY — CRL.P/9524/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code1 Section 506, 34, 504, 376, 323, 420, 313, 417. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010440602025
Filing Number
CRL.P/9186/2025
Filing Date
03-07-2025
Registration No
CRL.P/9524/2025
Registration Date
07-07-2025
Judge
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Coram
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.P ( 112 )
Sub-Category
482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-U/S 482/-U/S 528 ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MR SYED SHOAIB
Adv. KARIAPPA N.A
Respondent(s)
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
CHIEF SPUERINTENDENT
Adv. SHIVAPRASAD B SAJJAN
MRS KAVI VERMA
Adv. ABDUL MAJID,NISHAD S A
Hearing History
Judge: M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORDERS
ADMISSION
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-07-2025 | ORDERS |
| 20-01-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 17-12-2025 | ORDERS |
| 19-11-2025 | ORDERS |
| 06-11-2025 | ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CRL.P/9524/2025 - Syed Shoaib v. State of Karnataka The Karnataka High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to quash an FIR alleging rape, cheating, fraud, criminal intimidation, and forced abortion. The court found serious triable issues requiring investigation: the complainant alleged a 10-year relationship involving deception (fake marriage while petitioner was already married), forced religious conversion, financial exploitation (~60-70 lakhs), forced abortions, death threats, and blackmail using intimate videos, despite the relationship's apparent consensuality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRL.P/9524/2025 - Syed Shoaib v. State of Karnataka The Karnataka High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to quash an FIR alleging rape, cheating, fraud, criminal intimidation, and forced abortion. The court found serious triable issues requiring investigation: the complainant alleged a 10-year relationship involving deception (fake marriage while petitioner was already married), forced religious conversion, financial exploitation (~60-70 lakhs), forced abortions, death threats, and blackmail using intimate videos, despite the relationship's apparent consensuality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts