BASAVANAGOWDA vs SUSHEELAMMA — WP/20871/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010433992021

Filing Number

WP/18140/2021

Filing Date

17-Nov-2021

Registration No

WP/20871/2021

Registration Date

20-Nov-2021

Judge

Vijaykumar A. Patil

Coram

Vijaykumar A. Patil

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

CPC-Civil Procedure Code ( 24 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BASAVANAGOWDA

    Adv. MAHESH R UPPIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHEELAMMA

  2. 2.SMT. RATHNAMMA

    Adv. N PRAVEEN KUMAR

  3. 3.SHIVALINGAPPAGOWDA

    Adv. N PRAVEEN KUMAR

  4. 4.NIRMALA

    Adv. N PRAVEEN KUMAR

  5. 5.VANAJAKSHAMMA

    Adv. N PRAVEEN KUMAR

  6. 6.BANGARAMMA

  7. 7.GOWRAMMA

  8. 8.ANASUYAMMA

  9. 9.MALLIKARJUNA

  10. 10.HANUMANTHAGOWDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Vijaykumar A. PatilView PDF

    The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition filed by Basavanagowda seeking to quash an order from October 2021 because the parties settled the dispute through Lok Adalath on September 13, 2025. The court found the petition had become infructuous (purposeless) due to the settlement and accordingly dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Dec-2021

    Preliminary Hearing

    B M Shyam Prasad

  4. 25-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/20871/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition filed by Basavanagowda seeking to quash an order from October 2021 because the parties settled the dispute through Lok Adalath on September 13, 2025. The court found the petition had become infructuous (purposeless) due to the settlement and accordingly dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case