MR TUMAIYA N SETTI HALAGERE vs SMT K GAYATHRI — MFA/5488/2018

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010427012018

Filing Number

MFA/5488/2018

Filing Date

03-Jul-2018

Registration No

MFA/5488/2018

Registration Date

03-Jul-2018

Judge

Jayant Banerji , Rajesh Rai K

Coram

Jayant Banerji , Rajesh Rai K

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

FC-U/s 19 of Family Courts Act ( 49 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR TUMAIYA N SETTI HALAGERE

    Adv. RAJATH, ,RAJATH,RAJATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT K GAYATHRI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Jayant Banerji,rajesh Rai KView PDF

    The Karnataka High Court upheld the Family Court's declaration recognizing the marriage but modified the maintenance award based on a settlement agreement reached through mediation. The husband agreed to pay Rs. 75 lakhs as full and final settlement in lieu of the Rs. 50,000 monthly maintenance previously ordered, and the charge on the property was removed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    Jayant Banerji , Rajesh Rai K

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Jayant Banerji,rajesh Rai KView PDF

  5. 26-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing

    Jayant Banerji , K. V. Aravind

  6. 30-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 30-Jul-2018

    Admission

    Mohammad Nawaz , A.s.bopanna

  8. 03-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/5488/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Karnataka High Court upheld the Family Court's declaration recognizing the marriage but modified the maintenance award based on a settlement agreement reached through mediation. The husband agreed to pay Rs. 75 lakhs as full and final settlement in lieu of the Rs. 50,000 monthly maintenance previously ordered, and the charge on the property was removed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case