SRI. H.K.SREENIVASA vs SMT. C. JAYANTHI Advocate - SHRIDHARA K — CRL.RP/221/2022

Case under None Section none. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010420632021

Filing Number

CRL.RP/1106/2021

Filing Date

09-Nov-2021

Registration No

CRL.RP/221/2022

Registration Date

01-Feb-2022

Judge

H.p.sandesh

Coram

H.p.sandesh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.RP ( 114 )

Sub-Category

397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)-U/S 397/-U/S 438 ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

None Section none

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI. H.K.SREENIVASA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. C. JAYANTHI Advocate - SHRIDHARA K

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    H.p.sandeshView PDF

    Case Summary: CRL.RP 221/2022 Court Decision: The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the husband's criminal revision petition, upholding lower court orders that awarded the wife ₹20,000/month maintenance and ₹3,00,000 compensation under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Key Reasoning: The court found the husband's conduct—including living with another woman during the subsisting marriage, refusing to take back his wife, and filing multiple unsuccessful petitions against her—constitutes domestic violence within the statutory definition. Evidence of the husband's illicit relationship and two children from it, combined with documented emotional abuse and financial neglect since 1996, justified the awards as reasonable given his ₹94,000 monthly salary and ₹7.5 crore retirement benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Final Hearing

    H.p.sandesh

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Final Hearing - 2:30 Pm

    V Srishananda

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Final Hearing

    V Srishananda

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    Final Hearing

    V Srishananda

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    V Srishananda

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    S Vishwajith Shetty

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    S Vishwajith Shetty

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Ravi V Hosmani

  11. 20-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    S Vishwajith Shetty

  12. 05-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Ravi V Hosmani

  13. 17-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing

    Ravi V Hosmani

  14. 05-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing

    Ravi V Hosmani

  15. 21-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing

    Ravi V Hosmani

  16. 19-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing

    Ravi V Hosmani

  17. 17-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing

    Ravi V Hosmani

  18. 30-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing

    Ravi V Hosmani

  19. 27-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing

    Ravi V Hosmani

  20. 23-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing

    Ravi V Hosmani

  21. 15-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing

    Ravi V Hosmani

  22. 09-Oct-2025

    Admission

    Anant Ramanath Hegde

  23. 29-Jul-2025

    Admission

    Shivashankar Amarannavar

  24. 11-Jul-2025

    Admission

    Shivashankar Amarannavar

  25. 30-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Shivashankar Amarannavar

  26. 06-Jun-2025

    Orders

    J.m.khazi

  27. 21-Apr-2025

    Orders

    J.m.khazi

  28. 02-Apr-2025

    Admission

    J.m.khazi

  29. 11-Mar-2025

    Admission

    H.p.sandesh

  30. 24-Feb-2025

    Orders

    H.p.sandesh

  31. 24-Oct-2024

    Admission

    Pradeep Singh Yerur

  32. 01-Oct-2024

    Admission

    Pradeep Singh Yerur

  33. 14-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 09-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.RP/221/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRL.RP 221/2022 Court Decision: The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the husband's criminal revision petition, upholding lower court orders that awarded the wife ₹20,000/month maintenance and ₹3,00,000 compensation under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Key Reasoning: The court found the husband's conduct—including living with another woman during the subsisting marriage, refusing to take back his wife, and filing multiple unsuccessful petitions against her—constitutes domestic violence within the statutory definition. Evidence of the husband's illicit relationship and two children from it, combined with documented emotional abuse and financial neglect since 1996, justified the awards as reasonable given his ₹94,000 monthly salary and ₹7.5 crore retirement benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case