T N TYAGRAJ vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WP/17750/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010394572026
Filing Number
WP/17951/2026
Filing Date
12-06-2026
Registration No
WP/17750/2026
Registration Date
12-06-2026
Judge
B M SHYAM PRASAD
Coram
B M SHYAM PRASAD
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
RES-Residuary ( 91 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T N TYAGRAJ
Adv. POORNIMA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
. TUMAKURU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
T.N. DHIRESH KUMAR
B.M.RAJENDRA
Hearing History
Judge: B M SHYAM PRASAD
FRESH MATTER/S
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | FRESH MATTER/S |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY: WP 17750/2026 The Karnataka High Court found that the two-day timeframe (June 10-12, 2026) granted to petitioner T N Tyagraj to remove construction deviations before demolition was unreasonably short. Justice B M Shyam Prasad held that since an appellate remedy existed under Section 443-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, the petitioner deserved adequate opportunity to pursue it. The Court deferred demolition and directed authorities to issue a fresh demolition notice after seven days, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal while reserving all merits for the appellate forum's consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: WP 17750/2026 The Karnataka High Court found that the two-day timeframe (June 10-12, 2026) granted to petitioner T N Tyagraj to remove construction deviations before demolition was unreasonably short. Justice B M Shyam Prasad held that since an appellate remedy existed under Section 443-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, the petitioner deserved adequate opportunity to pursue it. The Court deferred demolition and directed authorities to issue a fresh demolition notice after seven days, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal while reserving all merits for the appellate forum's consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts