SRI SACHIN NAGARAJ N vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WP/17822/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jul-2026

CNR: KAHC010387352026

Filing Number

WP/17615/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/17822/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

B M Shyam Prasad

Coram

B M Shyam Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

MVT-Motor Vehicles Taxation Act ( 117 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI SACHIN NAGARAJ N

    Adv. A S PARASARA KUMAR

  2. 2.SRI RAKESH DEAYYA HEGDE

  3. 3.SRI YARAM SETTY VENKATA SATHYA NARAYANA

  4. 4.SMT YARRAM SETTY NAGALAKSHMI

  5. 5.SRI POTALA SATHISH

  6. 6.SRI NARENDRA KUMAR VASI REDDY

  7. 7.SRI MANUKONDA RAMBABU

  8. 8.M/S RAYYAN TRAVELS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTS

  3. 3.UNION OF INDIA

Case History

  1. 24-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jul-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    B M Shyam Prasad

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    B M Shyam PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/17822/2026 Outcome: Interim order granted. The High Court of Karnataka granted an interim order as prayed by the petitioners for parity with similar cases, valid until the next hearing on 24.07.2026. However, authorities may raise a demand against the petitioners if inspection reveals the vehicle is being used as a commercial transport vehicle to ferry passengers to definite destinations within or outside the State, subject to further court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17822/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/17822/2026 Outcome: Interim order granted. The High Court of Karnataka granted an interim order as prayed by the petitioners for parity with similar cases, valid until the next hearing on 24.07.2026. However, authorities may raise a demand against the petitioners if inspection reveals the vehicle is being used as a commercial transport vehicle to ferry passengers to definite destinations within or outside the State, subject to further court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case